Dan Keith

698 citations
10 papers · 75 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Keith

9 papers receiving 68 citations

Peers

Dan Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Political Science and International Relations 60
  • Public Administration 7
  • Gender Studies 12
  • Communication 8
  • Strategy and Management 13
Replace Enrico Calossi with:
Enrico Calossi Italy
Sidney A. Pearson United States
Aykut Öztürk United Kingdom
Tim Spier Germany
Ulrich Willems Germany
Bettina Westle Germany
Kai-Uwe Schnapp Germany
Colette Ysmal France
Michael J. Gerhardt United States
Karl-Rudolf Körte Germany
Dan Keith relative to Enrico Calossi Italy Enrico Calossi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Enrico Calossi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Keith. The network helps show where Dan Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Dan Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Keith Line = papers co-authored together Dan Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201623
2 202014
3 201011
4 201710
5 20168
6 20196
7 20201
8 20171
9
Emerging divisions on trade after Brexit
20191
10 20190

About Dan Keith

Dan Keith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 10 papers that have together received 75 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Anarchism and Radical Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (60 citations), Public Administration (7 citations), Gender Studies (12 citations), Communication (8 citations) and Strategy and Management (13 citations). Dan Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Bice Maiguashca, Jonathan Dean, Paul Webb, Charles Lees, Giorgos Charalambous, Dan Hough, Sofia Vasilopoulou, Chris Mungall, James A. Overton and Daniel Himmelstein. Their work appears in journals such as Communist and Post-Communist Studies, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact