Dan Beverly Fu

52 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Dan Beverly Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 152
  • Ophthalmology 46
  • Infectious Diseases 75
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 31
  • Nephrology 25
Replace Shang Li with:
Shang Li China
Cindy Ung United States
Yi Shi China
Wasee Tulvatana Thailand
Adi Einan Lifshitz Israel
Asim V. Farooq United States
Michael Gerometta Australia
Vuslat Gürlü Türkiye
Kathryn Westendorf Canada
Damien Guindolet France
Dan Beverly Fu relative to Shang Li China Shang Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.5×
Shang Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Beverly Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Beverly Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Beverly Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Beverly Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Beverly Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Beverly Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Beverly Fu. The network helps show where Dan Beverly Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Beverly Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Beverly Fu Line = papers co-authored together Dan Beverly Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202169
2 201341
3 202041
4 202132
5 202131
6 202024
7 202021
8 201520
9 202019
10 202219
11 202018
12 202118
13 201916
14 202115
15 202215
16 202014
17 202112
18 201911
19 202111
20 202010

About Dan Beverly Fu

Dan Beverly Fu is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Agronomy and Crop Science, Epidemiology and Toxicology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (18 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (152 citations), Ophthalmology (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (75 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (31 citations) and Nephrology (25 citations). Dan Beverly Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xingtao Zhou, Xuan Ding, Huamao Miao, Jianmin Shang, Meiyan Li, Xiaoying Wang, Yu Zhao, Li Zeng, Jing Zhao and Mi Tian. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Ophthalmology, Frontiers in Medicine, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Annals of Translational Medicine and Frontiers in Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact