Michael Gerometta

410 citations
16 papers · 190 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Gerometta

16 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers

Michael Gerometta
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Internal Medicine 50
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 80
  • Ophthalmology 31
  • Hematology 29
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 10
Replace Kashyap Patel with:
Kashyap Patel United States
Hikmet Hasıripi Türkiye
Agnieszka Kubicka‐Trząska Poland
Tanu Garg United States
H-P Hartung Germany
Z. Holmes South Africa
Feimei Liu United States
Eleni K. Konstantinou United States
Roberto Assandri Italy
Fadi El Baba United States
Michael Gerometta relative to Kashyap Patel United States Kashyap Patel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kashyap Patel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gerometta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gerometta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gerometta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gerometta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gerometta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gerometta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gerometta. The network helps show where Michael Gerometta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gerometta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gerometta Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gerometta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202332
2 200426
3 199124
4 200617
5 201117
6 201317
7 200816
8 201714
9 20248
10 20117
11
An evaluation of the VetREDTM canine heartworm antigen test.
19903
12 20143
13 20063
14 20241
15 20071
16 20071

About Michael Gerometta

Michael Gerometta is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (50 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (80 citations), Ophthalmology (31 citations), Hematology (29 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (10 citations). Michael Gerometta has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David Macfarlane, Richard Smart, Timothy A. Morris, Paul R. Eisenberg, Wendy Tsui, Andrew M. Scott, Peter Bundesen, Philip J. Hogg, Craig A. Pedersen and Jason W.H. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Scientific Reports and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact