Dan Anbar

420 citations
19 papers · 292 indexed · h-index 12

Dan Anbar

19 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Dan Anbar
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Statistics and Probability 107
  • Management Science and Operations Research 64
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 32
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 37
  • Reproductive Medicine 12
Replace Dai Feng with:
Dai Feng United States
C. K. McPherson United Kingdom
Kathy Russell United States
Mingxiu Hu United States
Cristina Rueda Spain
Rimma Pivovarov United States
Beverley Charles Rowe United Kingdom
Elı́as Moreno Spain
Leah R. Jager United States
Michael Mendis United States
Dan Anbar relative to Dai Feng United States Dai Feng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dai Feng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Anbar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Anbar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Anbar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Anbar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Anbar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Anbar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Anbar. The network helps show where Dan Anbar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Dan Anbar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Anbar Line = papers co-authored together Dan Anbar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20034
2 19943
3 199411
4 198562
5 198415
6
Cancer and leukemia group B phase II non-small cell lung carcinoma trial: aziridinylbenzoquinone (AZQ).
19832
7
The relative efficiency of Zelen's prerandomization design for clinical trials.
198324
8 198320
9 198324
10 198221
11 197827
12 197811
13 19781
14 19776
15 19777
16 197623
17 19761
18 197612
19 197318

About Dan Anbar

Dan Anbar is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (2 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Statistical and numerical algorithms (1 paper) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (107 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (64 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (37 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (12 citations). Dan Anbar has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include William W. Hines, Douglas C. Montgomery, Gerald P. Murphy, Andrew G. Glass, Barry S. Stein, Joseph A. Smith, L. Michael Glode, D. T. Max, John N. Wettlaufer and Ehud Kalai. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Statistics, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Biometrics, The American Statistician and Controlled Clinical Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026