The Annals of Statistics

6.0k papers and 416.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in The Annals of Statistics in the last decades have received a total of 416.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Annals of Statistics usually cover Statistics and Probability (4.3k papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.9k papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (961 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods and Inference (3.0k papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1.5k papers) and Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Annals of Statistics are Gideon Schwarz, Jerome H. Friedman, B. Efron, Charles J. Stone, Robert Tibshirani, Malcolm H. Ray, Yoav Benjamini, Trevor Hastie, Jianqing Fan and Daniel Yekutieli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Annals of Statistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Annals of Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Annals of Statistics.

Countries where authors publish in The Annals of Statistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Annals of Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Annals of Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Annals of Statistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025