Ehud Kalai
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.2%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 0.05%
- Safety Research top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Co-authors
- Meir SmorodinskyDov SametEhud LehrerEitan ZemelChaim FershtmanWilliam StanfordKenneth L. JuddDavid P. Baron
- Topics
- Game Theory and Applications (40 papers)Economic theories and models (34 papers)Game Theory and Voting Systems (30 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchGeneral Decision SciencesEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelCanada
In The Last Decade
Ehud Kalai
66 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Economics and Econometrics 3.3k
- Management Science and Operations Research 2.9k
- Safety Research 801
- Artificial Intelligence 427
- Computer Networks and Communications 416
Countries citing papers authored by Ehud Kalai
This map shows the geographic impact of Ehud Kalai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ehud Kalai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ehud Kalai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ehud Kalai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ehud Kalai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ehud Kalai. The network helps show where Ehud Kalai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ehud Kalai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ehud Kalai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ehud Kalai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ehud Kalai. Ehud Kalai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Partially-Specified Large Games | 8 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 77 | |
| 9 | 117 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 169 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problembreakdown → | 1050 |
About Ehud Kalai
Ehud Kalai is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (40 papers), Economic theories and models (34 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (2.9k citations), General Decision Sciences (330 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (3.3k citations). Ehud Kalai has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Meir Smorodinsky, Dov Samet, Ehud Lehrer, Eitan Zemel, Chaim Fershtman, William Stanford, Kenneth L. Judd, David P. Baron, Eitan Muller and Adam Tauman Kalai. Their work appears in journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Econometrica and Management Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.