Dagmar Krebs

795 total citations
28 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Dagmar Krebs is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dagmar Krebs has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dagmar Krebs's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Dagmar Krebs is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Dagmar Krebs collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Israel. Dagmar Krebs's co-authors include Jan Karem Höhne, Gerald Albaum, Peter Schmidt, Beatrice Rammstedt, Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, Stephan Schlosser, Siegfried Gabler, Steffen Kühnel, Karl Schuessler and Yaacov G. Bachner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Marketing Research and Social Indicators Research.

In The Last Decade

Dagmar Krebs

26 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dagmar Krebs Germany	9	150	51	36	34	33	28	359
Kenneth A. Bollen United States	6	78 0.5×	96 1.9×	41 1.1×	54 1.6×	35 1.1×	7	396
Steffen Kühnel Germany	9	104 0.7×	28 0.5×	31 0.9×	41 1.2×	22 0.7×	28	369
Kwame Boadu Canada	6	67 0.4×	46 0.9×	25 0.7×	46 1.4×	28 0.8×	7	343
Wolfgang Jagodzinski Germany	11	225 1.5×	100 2.0×	20 0.6×	29 0.9×	24 0.7×	39	399
Wijbrandt H. van Schuur Netherlands	9	164 1.1×	118 2.3×	49 1.4×	75 2.2×	28 0.8×	15	613
Ali Shamsollahi Australia	6	92 0.6×	82 1.6×	24 0.7×	28 0.8×	31 0.9×	6	375
Gail H. Weems United States	8	64 0.4×	89 1.7×	23 0.6×	45 1.3×	85 2.6×	8	350
Roxanne M. Laczo United States	6	114 0.8×	85 1.7×	18 0.5×	26 0.8×	21 0.6×	7	319
Deborah M. Switzer United States	6	89 0.6×	86 1.7×	20 0.6×	51 1.5×	139 4.2×	12	470
Hyuckseung Yang United States	6	44 0.3×	58 1.1×	36 1.0×	19 0.6×	34 1.0×	10	379

Countries citing papers authored by Dagmar Krebs

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmar Krebs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmar Krebs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmar Krebs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmar Krebs

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmar Krebs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmar Krebs. The network helps show where Dagmar Krebs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dagmar Krebs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dagmar Krebs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dagmar Krebs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dagmar Krebs. Dagmar Krebs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Höhne, Jan Karem, et al.. (2021). Measurement properties of completely and end labeled unipolar and bipolar scales in Likert-type questions on income (in)equality. Social Science Research. 97. 102544–102544. 16 indexed citations

Höhne, Jan Karem, et al.. (2020). Measuring Income (In)equality: Comparing Survey Questions With Unipolar and Bipolar Scales in a Probability-Based Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review. 40(1). 108–123. 12 indexed citations

Krebs, Dagmar & Yaacov G. Bachner. (2018). Effects of Rating Scale Direction under the Condition of Different Reading Direction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(1). 21. 4 indexed citations

Höhne, Jan Karem, Stephan Schlosser, & Dagmar Krebs. (2017). Investigating Cognitive Effort and Response Quality of Question Formats in Web Surveys Using Paradata. Field Methods. 29(4). 365–382. 37 indexed citations

Höhne, Jan Karem & Dagmar Krebs. (2017). Scale direction effects in agree/disagree and item-specific questions: a comparison of question formats. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 21(1). 91–103. 25 indexed citations

Eifler, Stefanie, Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, & Dagmar Krebs. (2011). Die Methodenausbildung in sozialwissenschaftlichen BA-Studiengängen. 443–465. 2 indexed citations

Krebs, Dagmar, et al.. (2010). Positive First or Negative First?. Methodology. 6(3). 118–127. 19 indexed citations

Rammstedt, Beatrice & Dagmar Krebs. (2007). Does Response Scale Format Affect the Answering of Personality Scales?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 23(1). 32–38. 47 indexed citations

Schnell, Rainer & Dagmar Krebs. (2002). Die Ausbildung in Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Ergebnisse der Befragung der Lehrenden durch die AG "Methodenausbildung". Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 31(1). 10. 1 indexed citations

10.

Kühnel, Steffen & Dagmar Krebs. (2001). Statistik für die Sozialwissenschaften. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. 5 indexed citations

11.

Krebs, Dagmar, et al.. (1998). Zum Problem der Abbildung eindimensional konzipierter Konstrukte bei entgegengesetzter Itempolung. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 81–110. 3 indexed citations

12.

Krebs, Dagmar. (1995). Selbstselektion: demographisches oder attitudinales Problem. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 114–125.

13.

Gabler, Siegfried, Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, & Dagmar Krebs. (1994). Gewichtung in der Umfragepraxis. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks. 36 indexed citations

14.

Krebs, Dagmar, et al.. (1993). Richtungseffekte von Itemformulierungen. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 28. 1 indexed citations

15.

Bien, Walter, et al.. (1991). Wie zuverlässig ist die Verwirklichung von Stichprobenverfahren? Random route versus Einwohnermeldeamtsstichprobe. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 15(28). 65–72. 3 indexed citations

16.

Krebs, Dagmar. (1991). Was ist sozial erwünscht? Der Grad sozialer Erwünschtheit von Einstellungsitems. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 17. 1 indexed citations

17.

Krebs, Dagmar, et al.. (1989). Materialismus-Postmaterialismus: Effekte unterschiedlicher Frageformulierungen bei der Messung des Konzeptes von Inglehart. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 13(24). 60–72. 8 indexed citations

18.

Krebs, Dagmar & Karl Schuessler. (1986). Zur Konstruktion von Einstellungsskalen im internationalen Vergleich. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 2 indexed citations

19.

Krebs, Dagmar. (1984). Nursing in primary health care.. PubMed. 30(5). 141–5. 13 indexed citations

20.

Krebs, Dagmar, et al.. (1983). Zur interkulturellen Validität von Meßinstrumenten. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 7(13). 45–57. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact