Daan Baas
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Face Recognition and Perception
Papers in
-
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 1
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 1
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 1
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 1
- Sleep and related disorders 1
- Co-authors
- René S. Kahn (4 shared papers)André Alemán (4 shared papers)Edward H.F. de Haan (2 shared papers)Nick F. Ramsey (1 shared paper)J. Korf (1 shared paper)Mattie Tops (1 shared paper)Theo F. Meijman (1 shared paper)Matthijs Vink (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychophysiology (1 paper)Brain Research Reviews (1 paper)Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (1 paper)Psychopharmacology (1 paper)NeuroImage (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Daan Baas
6 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Behavioral Neuroscience 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 421
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 206
- Psychiatry and Mental health 121
- Social Psychology 108
Countries citing papers authored by Daan Baas
This map shows the geographic impact of Daan Baas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daan Baas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daan Baas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daan Baas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daan Baas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daan Baas. The network helps show where Daan Baas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daan Baas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 424 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 29 |
About Daan Baas
Daan Baas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (103 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (421 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (206 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (121 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). Daan Baas has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include René S. Kahn, André Alemán, Edward H.F. de Haan, Nick F. Ramsey, J. Korf, Mattie Tops, Theo F. Meijman, Matthijs Vink, Johan A. den Boer and Gieta van der Pompe. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Brain Research Reviews, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Psychopharmacology and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.