Brain Research Reviews

1.3k papers and 210.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Brain Research Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 210.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Research Reviews usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (616 papers), Molecular Biology (403 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (331 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (333 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (116 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Research Reviews are Thompson Robinson, Wolfgang Klimesch, Terry E. Robinson, Peter W. Kalivas, Larry W. Swanson, Craig W. Berridge, Satoshi Ikemoto, James R. Augustine, Kent Berridge and André Parent.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Research Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Research Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Research Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Research Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Research Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025