Steven van der Werff
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Peter PutmanWillem van der DoesMaartje SchoorlNic J.A. van der WeeRouba KozakFloriana MogaveroElena LoboAmy C. Bilderbeck
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Steven van der Werff
6 papers receiving 500 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cognitive Neuroscience 237
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 164
- Clinical Psychology 129
- Social Psychology 94
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
Countries citing papers authored by Steven van der Werff
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven van der Werff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven van der Werff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven van der Werff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven van der Werff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven van der Werff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven van der Werff. The network helps show where Steven van der Werff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven van der Werff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven van der Werff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven van der Werff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven van der Werff. Steven van der Werff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Social brain, social dysfunction and social withdrawalbreakdown → | 256 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 173 |
About Steven van der Werff
Steven van der Werff is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (164 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations). Steven van der Werff has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Putman, Willem van der Does, Maartje Schoorl, Nic J.A. van der Wee, Rouba Kozak, Floriana Mogavero, Elena Lobo, Amy C. Bilderbeck, Martien J. Kas and Ilja M. J. Saris. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Journal of Traumatic Stress.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.