D. Z. Phillips
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gilbert HarmanRush RheesNicholas WolterstorffAntony FlewAlasdair MacIntyrePaul RicœurHeather I. SullivanBasil Mitchell
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers)Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (7 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
D. Z. Phillips
74 papers receiving 617 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Philosophy 465
- Sociology and Political Science 152
- Cognitive Neuroscience 119
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
- Political Science and International Relations 82
Countries citing papers authored by D. Z. Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Z. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Z. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Z. Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Z. Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Z. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Z. Phillips. The network helps show where D. Z. Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Z. Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Z. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Z. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Z. Phillips. D. Z. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | The Possibilities of Sense | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Recovering Religious Concepts: Closing Epistemic Divides | 6 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About D. Z. Phillips
D. Z. Phillips is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and General Social Sciences, having authored 89 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (7 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (465 citations), Religious studies (51 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations). D. Z. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gilbert Harman, Rush Rhees, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Antony Flew, Alasdair MacIntyre, Paul Ricœur, Heather I. Sullivan, Basil Mitchell, Aurel Kolnai and David Wiggins. Their work appears in journals such as Bioresource Technology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.