Rush Rhees

4.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
46 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Rush Rhees is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rush Rhees has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Philosophy, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Rush Rhees's work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). Rush Rhees is often cited by papers focused on Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). Rush Rhees collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Rush Rhees's co-authors include Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. M. Anscombe, Georg Henrik von Wright, Alice Ambrose, G. D. Duthie, D. Z. Phillips, Erik Stenius, A. J. Ayer, Anthony Kenny and Laurence Goldstein and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Psychology, The Philosophical Review and The Journal of Philosophy.

In The Last Decade

Rush Rhees

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.

1957 505 citations Alice Ambrose, Ludwig Wittgenstein et al. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research profile →
Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.

1957 463 citations G. D. Duthie, Ludwig Wittgenstein et al. The Philosophical Quarterly profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rush Rhees United Kingdom	16	828	457	204	191	180	46	1.6k
Georg Henrik von Wright Finland	18	782 0.9×	545 1.2×	482 2.4×	181 0.9×	245 1.4×	47	2.3k
Norman Malcolm United Kingdom	21	743 0.9×	535 1.2×	138 0.7×	94 0.5×	180 1.0×	68	1.8k
John Perry United States	14	355 0.4×	521 1.1×	137 0.7×	100 0.5×	108 0.6×	55	1.1k
A. J. Ayer United Kingdom	15	631 0.8×	408 0.9×	153 0.8×	87 0.5×	188 1.0×	53	1.5k
Anthony Kenny United States	26	1.2k 1.4×	497 1.1×	228 1.1×	93 0.5×	277 1.5×	121	2.3k
Edmund L. Gettier United States	3	968 1.2×	527 1.2×	288 1.4×	58 0.3×	210 1.2×	4	1.5k
Susan Haack United States	21	626 0.8×	364 0.8×	271 1.3×	120 0.6×	326 1.8×	170	1.8k
Keith Lehrer United States	22	1.2k 1.4×	728 1.6×	346 1.7×	56 0.3×	378 2.1×	127	2.4k
Richard E. Grandy United States	17	256 0.3×	289 0.6×	134 0.7×	548 2.9×	126 0.7×	44	1.4k
Christian J. W. Kloesel United States	5	459 0.6×	171 0.4×	72 0.4×	97 0.5×	224 1.2×	13	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Rush Rhees

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rush Rhees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rush Rhees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rush Rhees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rush Rhees

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rush Rhees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rush Rhees. The network helps show where Rush Rhees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rush Rhees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rush Rhees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rush Rhees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rush Rhees. Rush Rhees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Rhees, Rush. (2004). The Life of Jesus of Nazareth: A Study. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

2.

Rhees, Rush, et al.. (2002). Conversations avec Ludwig Wittgenstein. Presses Universitaires de France eBooks.

3.

Rhees, Rush. (2002). Five Topics in Conversations with Wittgenstein (Numbers; Concept‐Formation; Time‐Reactions; Induction; Causality). Philosophical Investigations. 25(1). 1–19. 2 indexed citations

4.

Rhees, Rush, et al.. (2001). On Religion. Faith and Philosophy. 18(4). 409–415. 3 indexed citations

5.

Rhees, Rush & D. Z. Phillips. (1998). Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 48 indexed citations

6.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Rush Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe. (1989). Bemerkungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik. Suhrkamp eBooks. 32 indexed citations

7.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, et al.. (1989). Notes sur l'expérience privée et les “sense data".

8.

Rhees, Rush. (1984). Recollections of Wittgenstein : Hermine Wittgenstein--Fania Pascal--F.R. Leavis--John King--M. O'C. Drury. Oxford University Press eBooks.

9.

Rhees, Rush. (1984). The Language of Sense Data and Private Experience — I. Philosophical Investigations. 7(1). 1–45. 2 indexed citations

10.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, et al.. (1983). Remarques sur les fondements des mathématiques. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5 indexed citations

11.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Rush Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe. (1982). Das Blaue Buch ; Eine philosophische Betrachtung . Zettel. Suhrkamp eBooks. 2 indexed citations

12.

Rhees, Rush, et al.. (1982). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Personal Recollections. The American Journal of Psychology. 95(1). 178–178. 37 indexed citations

13.

Rhees, Rush, et al.. (1976). Wittgenstein's Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics. Cambridge, 1939. 5 indexed citations

14.

Goldstein, Laurence, Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. H. von Wright, Rush Rhees, & Anthony Kenny. (1975). Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 25(100). 279–279. 25 indexed citations

15.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, et al.. (1971). Leçons et conversations : sur l'esthétique, la psychologie et la croyance religieuse. Gallimard eBooks. 2 indexed citations

16.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, et al.. (1971). Leçons et conversations : sur l'esthétique, la psychologie et la croyance religieuse . Suivies de Conférence sur l'éthique. Gallimard eBooks.

17.

Stenius, Erik, Ludwig Wittgenstein, & Rush Rhees. (1966). Philosophische Bemerkungen.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 16(65). 371–371. 17 indexed citations

18.

Duthie, G. D., Ludwig Wittgenstein, Georg Henrik von Wright, Rush Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe. (1957). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 7(29). 368–368. 463 indexed citations breakdown →

19.

Ambrose, Alice, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Georg Henrik von Wright, Rush Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe. (1957). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 18(2). 262–262. 505 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Ayer, A. J. & Rush Rhees. (1954). Symposium: “Can There Be A Private Language?”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 28(1). 63–94. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact