D. H. Phong
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Geometry and Topology top 0.2%
- Applied Mathematics top 0.2%
- Mathematical Physics top 0.5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Eric D’HokerE. M. SteinJacob SturmI. M. KricheverCharles FeffermanSébastien PicardXiangwen ZhangJian Song
- Topics
- Geometry and complex manifolds (52 papers)Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (46 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (42 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersReviews of Modern Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
D. H. Phong
126 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.9k
- Geometry and Topology 1.7k
- Applied Mathematics 1.5k
- Mathematical Physics 1.1k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 887
Countries citing papers authored by D. H. Phong
This map shows the geographic impact of D. H. Phong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. H. Phong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. H. Phong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. H. Phong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. H. Phong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. H. Phong. The network helps show where D. H. Phong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. H. Phong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. H. Phong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. H. Phong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. H. Phong. D. H. Phong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Advances in geometric analysis | 25 |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | Lectures on Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory and Integrable Systems | 1 |
| 16 | 60 | |
| 17 | 397 | |
| 18 | Advanced series in mathematical physics | 98 |
| 19 | Pseudo-differential operators with positive symbols | 3 |
| 20 | On Holder and L('P) Estimates for the Partial D-Bar Equation on Strongly Pseudo-convex Domains | 2 |
About D. H. Phong
D. H. Phong is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 128 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometry and complex manifolds (52 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (46 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (1.7k citations), Applied Mathematics (1.5k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.9k citations). D. H. Phong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eric D’Hoker, E. M. Stein, Jacob Sturm, I. M. Krichever, Charles Fefferman, Sébastien Picard, Xiangwen Zhang, Jian Song, Charles Fefferman and Kenichiro Aoki. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Reviews of Modern Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.