D. Blok

463 citations
20 papers · 366 indexed · h-index 11

D. Blok

20 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

D. Blok
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 114
  • Pharmaceutical Science 30
  • Genetics 110
  • Gastroenterology 18
  • Epidemiology 110
Replace Thomas R. Poskitt with:
Thomas R. Poskitt United States
Derek K. Marsee United States
Gabriel Steiner Germany
Chi‐Mou Juang Taiwan
John G. Hintermeister United States
B Azadeh Qatar
H S Thompson United Kingdom
E. Fruscella Italy
Eiko Hayase Japan
C.W. Tuk Netherlands
D. Blok relative to Thomas R. Poskitt United States Thomas R. Poskitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas R. Poskitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Blok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Blok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Blok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Blok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Blok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Blok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Blok. The network helps show where D. Blok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Blok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Blok Line = papers co-authored together D. Blok links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Helicobacter pylori in the etiology of cholesterol gallstones
200519
2 200412
3 200428
4 200111
5 199973
6 19997
7 199611
8
A new 99mTc labelling method for leucocytes: in vitro and in vivo comparison with 99mTc-HMPAO.
19956
9
Prospective comparative study of technetium-99m-WBCs and indium-111-granulocytes for the examination of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
199345
10 199210
11 19916
12 199114
13 19917
14 19901
15 199018
16 198961
17 19896
18 19898
19 19887
20 198716

About D. Blok

D. Blok is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Epidemiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (6 papers), Microscopic Colitis (6 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (30 citations) and Genetics (110 citations). D. Blok has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Pieter Vermeij, E.K.J. Pauwels, J. W. Arndt, Elin Pauwels, C. B. H. W. Lamers, Hein W. Verspaget, A. S. Peña, Irene T. Weterman, I. Biemond and H. W. Verspaget. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Nuclear Medicine Communications, European Journal of Radiology and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026