Nuclear Medicine and Biology

3.6k papers and 75.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology in the last decades have received a total of 75.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k papers), Molecular Biology (980 papers) and Oncology (802 papers) specifically the topics of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (1.7k papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (999 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (366 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nuclear Medicine and Biology are Michael J. Welch, Jason S. Lewis, Jean Logan, Michael R. Zalutsky, Sung‐Cheng Huang, Hank F. Kung, Peter S. Conti, Wynn A. Volkert, Martin W. Brechbiel and Yasuhisa Fujibayashi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nuclear Medicine and Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nuclear Medicine and Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025