R. Tham

978 citations
33 papers · 733 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
    • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neurology top 5%
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Papers in

R. Tham

32 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers

R. Tham
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Sensory Systems 166
  • Neurology 140
  • Chemical Health and Safety 11
  • Speech and Hearing 72
  • Biochemistry 46
Replace Seiko F. Okada with:
Seiko F. Okada United States
Robert D. S. Pitceathly United Kingdom
Mieke Timmers Netherlands
Karl Heinz Krause Switzerland
Michela Conte Italy
M Okamoto Japan
Eleni Beli United States
Takehisa Hirayama Japan
E. Schneider Germany
Barry E. Argent United Kingdom
R. Tham relative to Seiko F. Okada United States Seiko F. Okada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Seiko F. Okada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Tham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Tham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Tham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Tham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Tham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Tham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Tham. The network helps show where R. Tham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Tham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Tham Line = papers co-authored together R. Tham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961115
2 199085
3 198756
4 199147
5 198944
6 199332
7 199331
8 196628
9 199127
10 200227
11
Vestibular and oculomotor disturbances caused by industrial solvents.
198025
12 198220
13 197818
14 198317
15 199314
16 199014
17 198614
18 197913
19 197113
20 198213

About R. Tham

R. Tham is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems, Ophthalmology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (14 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (2 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (166 citations), Neurology (140 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (11 citations), Speech and Hearing (72 citations) and Biochemistry (46 citations). R. Tham has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Birgitta Larsby, Lilian Larsson, Bo Holmstedt, Lars Ödkvist, Birgitta Eriksson, Karel J. van Erpecum, J. L. Terpstra, T. Ledin, A. R. Janssens and C. Möller. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Neuroscience, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, Neurotoxicology and Teratology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact