Cushing Strout
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Education top 10%
- History top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard HofstadterJoan Wallach ScottJoyce ApplebyRaymond MartinMargaret C. JacobLynn HuntSigmund FreudGeorge M. Marsden
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers)Political Theory and Influence (4 papers)Philosophy, History, and Historiography (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Cushing Strout
37 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Sociology and Political Science 248
- Political Science and International Relations 128
- Education 116
- History 81
- Philosophy 62
Countries citing papers authored by Cushing Strout
This map shows the geographic impact of Cushing Strout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cushing Strout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cushing Strout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cushing Strout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cushing Strout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cushing Strout. The network helps show where Cushing Strout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cushing Strout
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cushing Strout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cushing Strout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cushing Strout. Cushing Strout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revising Jefferson's portrait without a fine pencil | 0 |
| 2 | 124 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Intellectual history in America | 5 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Conscience, science and security : the case of Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 249 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Cushing Strout
Cushing Strout is a scholar working on General Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 56 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), Political Theory and Influence (4 papers) and Philosophy, History, and Historiography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (14 citations), History (81 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (248 citations). Cushing Strout has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Hofstadter, Joan Wallach Scott, Joyce Appleby, Raymond Martin, Margaret C. Jacob, Lynn Hunt, Sigmund Freud, George M. Marsden, Lewis Perry and Stow Persons. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.