Cristina Cantarella
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Karine MagalonMyriam CayreGiorgio BernardiFrancesca CavasinniSilvia RossiDiego CentonzeAlessandra MusellaGiorgia Mataluni
- Topics
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Cristina Cantarella
8 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 143
- Pharmacology 140
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 117
- Developmental Neuroscience 108
- Neurology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Cristina Cantarella
This map shows the geographic impact of Cristina Cantarella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cristina Cantarella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cristina Cantarella more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cristina Cantarella
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cristina Cantarella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cristina Cantarella. The network helps show where Cristina Cantarella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cristina Cantarella
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cristina Cantarella. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cristina Cantarella based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cristina Cantarella. Cristina Cantarella is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Diagnosis and treatment of pain in plexopathy, radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy and phantom limb pain. Evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain on Neurorehabilitation. | 12 |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 103 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 68 |
About Cristina Cantarella
Cristina Cantarella is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (108 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations) and Pharmacology (140 citations). Cristina Cantarella has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Karine Magalon, Myriam Cayre, Giorgio Bernardi, Francesca Cavasinni, Silvia Rossi, Diego Centonze, Alessandra Musella, Giorgia Mataluni, Pascale Durbec and Valentina De Chiara. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Molecular Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.