Craig Schlenoff

2.2k total citations
123 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Craig Schlenoff is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Schlenoff has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 35 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 25 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Craig Schlenoff's work include AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (29 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (28 papers) and Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (25 papers). Craig Schlenoff is often cited by papers focused on AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (29 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (28 papers) and Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (25 papers). Craig Schlenoff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Egypt and France. Craig Schlenoff's co-authors include Stephen Balakirsky, Zeid Kootbally, Raj Madhavan, Elena R. Messina, Thomas Krämer, Paulo Gonçalves, Brian A. Weiss, Edson Prestes, Satyandra K. Gupta and Sandro Rama Fiorini and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Craig Schlenoff

110 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Craig Schlenoff United States 18 631 376 268 263 182 123 1.2k
Wolfgang Reif Germany 17 431 0.7× 196 0.5× 198 0.7× 206 0.8× 144 0.8× 182 1.1k
Hehua Yan China 12 133 0.2× 331 0.9× 123 0.5× 322 1.2× 132 0.7× 17 985
Richard Goodwin United States 17 433 0.7× 172 0.5× 384 1.4× 52 0.2× 122 0.7× 47 994
Thomas Strang Germany 21 340 0.5× 190 0.5× 339 1.3× 91 0.3× 121 0.7× 90 1.6k
Arquimedes Canedo United States 14 354 0.6× 157 0.4× 125 0.5× 292 1.1× 88 0.5× 52 1.0k
Valeria Vittorini Italy 18 169 0.3× 146 0.4× 201 0.8× 361 1.4× 180 1.0× 60 1.1k
Kazi Masudul Alam Bangladesh 13 188 0.3× 90 0.2× 225 0.8× 419 1.6× 67 0.4× 32 1.2k
Ian C. Parmee United Kingdom 17 491 0.8× 106 0.3× 185 0.7× 142 0.5× 260 1.4× 74 1.2k
Brian A. Weiss United States 15 137 0.2× 374 1.0× 53 0.2× 241 0.9× 174 1.0× 67 898
Weiting Zhang China 14 278 0.4× 313 0.8× 92 0.3× 152 0.6× 92 0.5× 46 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Schlenoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Schlenoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Schlenoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Schlenoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Schlenoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Schlenoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Schlenoff. The network helps show where Craig Schlenoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Schlenoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Schlenoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Schlenoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Schlenoff. Craig Schlenoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (2024). Methods to evaluate 3D lidars used for automated driving. Measurement. 239. 115464–115464. 3 indexed citations
2.
Becker, Leandro Buss, Anthony J. Downs, Craig Schlenoff, et al.. (2024). Effects of the Human Presence among Robots in the ARIAC 2023 Industrial Automation Competition. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 110(3).
3.
Downs, Anthony J., et al.. (2016). Test methods for robot agility in manufacturing. Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application. 43(5). 563–572. 6 indexed citations
4.
Proctor, Frederick M., et al.. (2016). The Canonical Robot Command Language (CRCL). Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application. 43(5). 495–502. 15 indexed citations
5.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (2011). Performance Evaluation of Intelligent Systems at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 32(4). 959–67. 2 indexed citations
6.
Condon, Sherri, et al.. (2008). Applying Automated Metrics to Speech Translation Dialogs.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 9 indexed citations
7.
Weiss, Brian A., et al.. (2007). Technology Evaluations and Performance Metrics for Soldier-Worn Sensors for ASSIST | NIST. 13 indexed citations
8.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (2007). Performance Analysis of Symbolic Road Recognition for On-Road Driving | NIST. 1 indexed citations
9.
Schlenoff, Craig, Zeid Kootbally, & R. Madhavan. (2007). Driver aggressivity analysis within the prediction in dynamic environments (PRIDE) framework. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6561. 65611O–65611O. 5 indexed citations
10.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (2006). Overview of the First Advanced Technology Evaluations for ASSIST | NIST. 6 indexed citations
11.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (2005). A standard intelligent system ontology. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5804. 46–46. 7 indexed citations
12.
Madhavan, R. & Craig Schlenoff. (2005). The Effect of Process Models on Short-term Prediction of Moving Objects for Autonomous Driving. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems. 3(4). 509–523. 6 indexed citations
13.
Cañamero, Lola, Zachary Dodds, Lloyd Greenwald, et al.. (2004). The 2004 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. AI Magazine. 25(4). 95–95. 5 indexed citations
14.
Schlenoff, Craig, Jerome Ajot, & R. Madhavan. (2004). PRIDE: A Framework for Performance Evaluation of Intelligent Vehicles in Dynamic, On-Road Environments. 5 indexed citations
15.
Albus, James S., Craig Schlenoff, R. Madhavan, Stephen Balakirsky, & Tony Barbera. (2004). Integrating Disparate Knowledge Representations within 4D/RCS.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1–8. 1 indexed citations
16.
Barbera, Anthony J., Elena R. Messina, Huimin Huang, Craig Schlenoff, & Stephen Balakirsky. (2004). Software Engineering for Intelligent Control Systems.. Künstliche Intell.. 18(4). 22–26. 7 indexed citations
17.
Barbera, Anthony J., John A. Horst, Craig Schlenoff, Evan Wallace, & David W. Aha. (2003). Developing World Model Data Specifications as Metrics for Sensory Processing for On-Road Driving Tasks. 5 indexed citations
18.
Evans, John, Elena R. Messina, James S. Albus, & Craig Schlenoff. (2002). Knowledge Engineering for Real Time Control.
19.
Schlenoff, Craig, et al.. (1999). The essence of the process specification language. 16(4). 204–216. 29 indexed citations
20.
Grüninger, Michael, et al.. (1997). Using Process Requirements as the Basis for the Creation and Evaluation of Process Ontologies for Enterprise Modeling | NIST. Communications of the ACM. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026