C.P. Myers
- Molecular Biology
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cell Biology
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Samuel L. PfaffDavid DeanBülent MengüçFrederic D. BushmanWen-Yuan HuP.W. HaycockKieran C. MolloySimon Gosgnach
- Topics
- International Business and FDI (3 papers)Global trade and economics (3 papers)Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality ManagementGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceStrategy and Management
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
C.P. Myers
12 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Molecular Biology 182
- Strategy and Management 101
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 77
- Cell Biology 62
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59
Countries citing papers authored by C.P. Myers
This map shows the geographic impact of C.P. Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.P. Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.P. Myers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.P. Myers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.P. Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.P. Myers. The network helps show where C.P. Myers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.P. Myers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.P. Myers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.P. Myers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.P. Myers. C.P. Myers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 119 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 137 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 112 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | The ongoing debate over export performance : an investigation of New Zealand small industrial firms | 0 |
About C.P. Myers
C.P. Myers is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Developmental Neuroscience and Strategy and Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (3 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers) and Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (12 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (59 citations) and Strategy and Management (101 citations). C.P. Myers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Samuel L. Pfaff, David Dean, Bülent Mengüç, Frederic D. Bushman, Wen-Yuan Hu, P.W. Haycock, Kieran C. Molloy, Simon Gosgnach, Joseph W. Lewcock and James B. Aimone. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Gastroenterology and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.