Nathan Miller

500 citations
18 papers · 331 indexed · h-index 8

Nathan Miller

14 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Nathan Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cancer Research 105
  • Marketing 28
  • Developmental Neuroscience 10
  • Physiology 51
  • Molecular Biology 133
Replace William H. Pease with:
William H. Pease United States
Paula Álvarez‐González Spain
Robert C. Black United States
Namsuk Kim South Korea
Elisabeth Israels Perry United States
Brian J. Christian United States
Laura F. Edwards United States
Spencer D. Wood United States
Jean‐Paul Hubert France
Nathan Miller relative to William H. Pease United States William H. Pease's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William H. Pease · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Miller. The network helps show where Nathan Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Miller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Miller Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Miller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202021
2
Characterization of Fungicide Sensitivity and Analysis of Microsatellites for Population Studies of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum Causing Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon
20172
3 2008162
4
New World Coming: The 1920s and the Making of Modern America
20036
5 19970
6 19941
7
The U.S. Navy: A History
19903
8 198548
9 198214
10
The Roosevelt Chronicles
19792
11
The U.S. Navy: An Illustrated History
19770
12 19758
13 197032
14 19697
15 19690
16 196611
17 19633
18 196211

About Nathan Miller

Nathan Miller is a scholar working on Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 18 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Plant Disease Management Techniques (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers) and Military and Defense Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (105 citations), Marketing (28 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (10 citations). Nathan Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Scranton, Aleister J. Saunders, Qihong Huang, Sara Ansaloni, Jack T. Rogers, Neha Patel, Harry N. Scheiber, L. M. Quesada-Ocampo, Thomas C. Cochran and Stuart Bruchey. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Molecular Neurodegeneration and HortScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026