Constance Schmelzer

1.2k citations
22 papers · 968 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Constance Schmelzer

22 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Constance Schmelzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Biochemistry 147
  • Biochemistry 154
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Molecular Biology 691
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 122
Replace Ilenia Cirilli with:
Ilenia Cirilli Italy
Fuchao Chen China
Lorenzo Flori Italy
Balbir Singh India
Giulia Abate Italy
Aman Upaganlawar India
Leonardo del Valle‐Mondragón Mexico
Kazutoshi Murotomi Japan
Azizah Ugusman Malaysia
Joel Ramírez‐Emiliano Mexico
Constance Schmelzer relative to Ilenia Cirilli Italy Ilenia Cirilli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Ilenia Cirilli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Schmelzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Schmelzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Schmelzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Schmelzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Schmelzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Schmelzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Schmelzer. The network helps show where Constance Schmelzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance Schmelzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Schmelzer Line = papers co-authored together Constance Schmelzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008225
2 2011184
3 200887
4 200977
5 200758
6 200748
7 200745
8 200941
9 200934
10 201130
11 201029
12 201019
13 201118
14 201115
15 201111
16 201211
17 20129
18 20119
19 20088
20 20117

About Constance Schmelzer

Constance Schmelzer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (14 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (6 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (6 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (3 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (2 papers), Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms (2 papers) and Vitamin K Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (147 citations), Biochemistry (154 citations), Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Molecular Biology (691 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (122 citations). Constance Schmelzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Döring, Gerald Rimbach, Petra Niklowitz, Thomas Menke, Inka Lindner, Christine Boesch‐Saadatmandi, Osamu Hori, Seiichi Matsugo, Charlotte Schrader and Anika E. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as BioFactors, IUBMB Life, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition and BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact