Constance Scharff

8.0k citations
81 papers · 5.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 34

Constance Scharff

79 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following ...7491991202620022014200400600

Peers

Constance Scharff
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Developmental Biology 3.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.6k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 330
  • Ecology 2.0k
  • Cultural Studies 303
Replace Kurt Hammerschmidt with:
Kurt Hammerschmidt Germany
Johan J. Bolhuis Netherlands
Susan D. Healy United Kingdom
Julia Fischer Germany
David F. Sherry Canada
Kazuo Okanoya Japan
Karin Isler Switzerland
Claudio V. Mello United States
Jacques Balthazart Belgium
Allison J. Doupe United States
Constance Scharff relative to Kurt Hammerschmidt Germany Kurt Hammerschmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Kurt Hammerschmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Constance Scharff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Scharff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Scharff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Scharff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Scharff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Scharff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Scharff. The network helps show where Constance Scharff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Constance Scharff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Constance Scharff Line = papers co-authored together Constance Scharff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20239
3 20231
4 20224
5 202210
6 20217
7 20207
8 201922
9 201922
10 201947
11 20184
12 201738
13 201717
14 201616
15 201534
16 20157
17 2009355
18 200559
19 200419
20 2001117

About Constance Scharff

Constance Scharff is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cultural Studies, having authored 81 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (65 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (48 papers), Marine animal studies overview (38 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (9 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Language and cultural evolution (5 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (3.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.6k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (330 citations), Ecology (2.0k citations) and Cultural Studies (303 citations). Constance Scharff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Fernando Nottebohm, Simon E. Fisher, Sebastian Haesler, Erich D. Jarvis, Kazuo Okanoya, Johan J. Bolhuis, Christelle Rochefort, Iris Adam, Matthew R. Grossman and Fiona Doetsch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE, Neuron, Current Opinion in Neurobiology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026