Côme Bureau

1.8k citations
26 papers · 170 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Côme Bureau

24 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Côme Bureau
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 91
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 27
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 125
  • Emergency Medicine 28
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 13
Replace A. Medina Villanueva with:
A. Medina Villanueva Spain
Shiry Attie Argentina
Sylvène Rosselli France
Jean Reignier France
Yolanda M. López‐Fernández Spain
Irene Dot Spain
J. A. Cambronero Spain
Philippe Rico United States
Milind Sovani United Kingdom
Eric Ezingeard France
Côme Bureau relative to A. Medina Villanueva Spain A. Medina Villanueva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
A. Medina Villanueva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Côme Bureau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Côme Bureau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Côme Bureau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Côme Bureau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Côme Bureau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Côme Bureau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Côme Bureau. The network helps show where Côme Bureau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Côme Bureau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Côme Bureau Line = papers co-authored together Côme Bureau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201732
2 202325
3 202321
4 202114
5 202311
6 202210
7 20226
8 20236
9 20226
10 20234
11 20224
12 20234
13 20244
14 20193
15 20213
16 20213
17 20243
18 20192
19 20242
20 20202

About Côme Bureau

Côme Bureau is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Nephrology and Surgery, having authored 26 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (13 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (3 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (91 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (27 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (125 citations), Emergency Medicine (28 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (13 citations). Côme Bureau has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Martin Dres, Thomas Similowski, Alexandre Demoule, Marine Van Hollebeke, Maxens Decavèle, Élise Morawiec, Camille Rolland‐Debord, Julien Mayaux, Marie‐Cécile Nierat and Achille Kouatchet. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Intensive Care, Anesthesiology, Clinical Kidney Journal, Scientific Reports and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact