Countries where authors publish in Clinical Kidney Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Kidney Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Kidney Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal.
About Clinical Kidney Journal
The 3.2k papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal in the last decades have received a total of 36.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Kidney Journal usually cover Nephrology (1.6k papers), Transplantation (188 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (758 papers) specifically the topics of Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (655 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (516 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (374 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (235 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (210 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (186 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (171 papers) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (155 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Kidney Journal are Markus Ketteler, Willi Jahnen‐Dechent, Alberto Ortíz, Kitty J. Jager, Carmine Zoccali, José António Lopes, Sofía Jorge, Friedo W. Dekker, Norbert Lameire and Merel van Diepen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.