Sarah Benghanem

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 657 citations indexed

About

Sarah Benghanem is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Benghanem has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 657 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Emergency Medicine, 15 papers in Epidemiology and 12 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Sarah Benghanem's work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (19 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers). Sarah Benghanem is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (19 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (12 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers). Sarah Benghanem collaborates with scholars based in France, Brazil and United Kingdom. Sarah Benghanem's co-authors include Tarek Sharshar, Aurélien Mazeraud, Eléonore Bouchereau, Fernando A. Bozza, Cássia Righy, Alain Cariou, Étienne de Montmollin, Michaël Thy, Cássia Righy Shinotsuka and Frédéric Pène and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Benghanem

29 papers receiving 653 citations

Hit Papers

The spectrum of sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a clini... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 20 40 60

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Benghanem France 11 190 164 143 131 115 39 657
Michael Shoykhet United States 13 122 0.6× 91 0.6× 211 1.5× 24 0.2× 113 1.0× 25 672
Shouri Lahiri United States 15 100 0.5× 232 1.4× 340 2.4× 97 0.7× 46 0.4× 41 842
Lamine Abdennour France 14 252 1.3× 64 0.4× 521 3.6× 44 0.3× 121 1.1× 33 983
Mario Cigada Italy 20 142 0.7× 192 1.2× 213 1.5× 32 0.2× 25 0.2× 50 1.6k
João Gomes United States 13 316 1.7× 193 1.2× 480 3.4× 104 0.8× 148 1.3× 42 904
Marie Berg United States 5 138 0.7× 160 1.0× 132 0.9× 41 0.3× 311 2.7× 8 1.6k
Juha Koskenkari Finland 14 116 0.6× 75 0.5× 94 0.7× 21 0.2× 65 0.6× 34 580
J.M. Domínguez-Roldán Spain 17 271 1.4× 109 0.7× 397 2.8× 39 0.3× 167 1.5× 50 916
Anthony K. Sestokas United States 19 148 0.8× 43 0.3× 127 0.9× 58 0.4× 55 0.5× 46 1.1k
Christopher A. Lear New Zealand 24 230 1.2× 54 0.3× 83 0.6× 42 0.3× 179 1.6× 73 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Benghanem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Benghanem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Benghanem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Benghanem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Benghanem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Benghanem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Benghanem. The network helps show where Sarah Benghanem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Benghanem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Benghanem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Benghanem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Benghanem. Sarah Benghanem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Joffre, Jérémie, Peter Radermacher, Hatem Kallel, et al.. (2025). Vascular leakage during circulatory failure: physiopathology, impact and treatments. Annals of Intensive Care. 15(1). 79–79.
3.
Benghanem, Sarah, et al.. (2025). How can emotion and familiarity improve own-name oddball paradigms?. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 55(3). 103050–103050.
5.
Stiel, Laure, Alexandre Gaudet, Sara Thietart, et al.. (2024). Innate immune response in acute critical illness: a narrative review. Annals of Intensive Care. 14(1). 137–137. 5 indexed citations
6.
Hermann, Bertrand, Diego Candia‐Rivera, Tarek Sharshar, et al.. (2024). Aberrant brain–heart coupling is associated with the severity of post cardiac arrest brain injury. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 11(4). 866–882. 7 indexed citations
7.
Razazi, Keyvan, Damien Contou, Stéphane Legriel, et al.. (2024). Intracranial complications in adult patients with severe pneumococcal meningitis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Annals of Intensive Care. 14(1). 182–182.
8.
Benghanem, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Heart rate variability for neuro-prognostication after CA: Insight from the Parisian registry. Resuscitation. 202. 110294–110294. 2 indexed citations
9.
Ortuno, Sofia, Wulfran Bougouin, Sébastian Voicu, et al.. (2024). Long-term major events after hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Annals of Intensive Care. 14(1). 144–144. 1 indexed citations
10.
Laghlam, Driss, Sarah Benghanem, Sofia Ortuno, et al.. (2024). Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review. Annals of Intensive Care. 14(1). 45–45. 31 indexed citations
11.
Jaquet, Pierre, Camille Couffignal, Coralie Tardivon, et al.. (2023). PupillOmetry for preDIction of DeliriUM in ICU (PODIUM): protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study. BMJ Open. 13(7). e072095–e072095. 1 indexed citations
12.
Oubaya, Nadia, Slim Fourati, Sébastien Beaune, et al.. (2023). Prognosis of hospitalised adult patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 29(7). 943.e1–943.e8. 24 indexed citations
13.
Paul, Marine, Stéphane Legriel, Sarah Benghanem, et al.. (2023). Association between the Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP) score and reason for death after successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 6033–6033. 1 indexed citations
14.
15.
Paul, Marine, Sarah Benghanem, Sybille Merceron, et al.. (2022). Cerebrospinal fluid features in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: A pilot study. PLoS ONE. 17(7). e0270954–e0270954. 3 indexed citations
16.
Bourcier, Simon, Matthieu Jamme, Guillaume Savary, et al.. (2022). A multicentric prospective observational study of diagnosis and prognosis features in ICU mesenteric ischemia: the DIAGOMI study. Annals of Intensive Care. 12(1). 113–113. 19 indexed citations
17.
Benghanem, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Prognostication after cardiac arrest: how EEG and evoked potentials may improve the challenge. Annals of Intensive Care. 12(1). 111–111. 20 indexed citations
18.
Jozwiak, Mathieu, Jean‐Daniel Chiche, Julien Charpentier, et al.. (2020). Use of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Critically-Ill Patients With COVID-19. Frontiers in Medicine. 7. 614569–614569. 10 indexed citations
19.
Benghanem, Sarah, Charlotte Rosso, Eric Moulton, et al.. (2019). Aphasia outcome: the interactions between initial severity, lesion size and location. Journal of Neurology. 266(6). 1303–1309. 38 indexed citations
20.
Benghanem, Sarah, Marine Paul, Julien Charpentier, et al.. (2019). Value of EEG reactivity for prediction of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: Insights from the Parisian registry. Resuscitation. 142. 168–174. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026