Colin McLear

724 total citations
14 papers, 166 citations indexed

About

Colin McLear is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Colin McLear has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 166 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Colin McLear's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers). Colin McLear is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers). Colin McLear collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Colin McLear's co-authors include Andrew Chignell and Yoon Hyung Choi and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Colin McLear

12 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers

Colin McLear
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Philosophy 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 18
  • Political Science and International Relations 12
Replace Clinton Tolley with:
Clinton Tolley United States
Nicholas F. Stang Canada
Konstantin Pollok United States
Ian Proops United States
Wayne Waxman United States
Corey W. Dyck Canada
Markos Valaris Australia
Lisa Shabel United States
Michelle Grier United States
Desmond Hogan United States
Clinton Tolley United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Colin McLear
Colin McLear · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Colin McLear
Colin McLear · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Colin McLear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin McLear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin McLear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin McLear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin McLear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin McLear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin McLear. The network helps show where Colin McLear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colin McLear

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colin McLear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colin McLear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colin McLear. Colin McLear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3
"I Am the Original of All Objects": Apperception and the Substantial Subject
3
4 16
5
Kant and the Demands of Reflection
1
6 1
7 6
8 3
9 22
10 41
11
Comments on Stefanie Grüne's *Blinde Anschauung*
1
12 29
13
KANT ON ANIMALCONSCIOUSNESS
42
14 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026