Ian Proops

788 total citations
21 papers, 172 citations indexed

About

Ian Proops is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian Proops has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 172 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Philosophy, 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Ian Proops's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (9 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers). Ian Proops is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (9 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers). Ian Proops collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Ian Proops's co-authors include Michael Kremer and Roy Sorensen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Ian Proops

17 papers receiving 137 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ian Proops United States 9 146 93 45 20 19 21 172
Gary Ebbs United States 7 89 0.6× 126 1.4× 76 1.7× 15 0.8× 10 0.5× 23 165
Oskari Kuusela United Kingdom 6 154 1.1× 108 1.2× 13 0.3× 53 2.6× 13 0.7× 24 178
Michael Pendlebury South Africa 7 78 0.5× 82 0.9× 35 0.8× 14 0.7× 26 1.4× 37 140
Stewart Candlish Australia 8 92 0.6× 73 0.8× 33 0.7× 7 0.3× 9 0.5× 25 129
Wolfgang Künne Germany 8 154 1.1× 185 2.0× 108 2.4× 42 2.1× 16 0.8× 29 249
Donna M. Summerfield United States 4 107 0.7× 79 0.8× 21 0.5× 24 1.2× 9 0.5× 7 128
Avner Baz United States 7 133 0.9× 80 0.9× 37 0.8× 5 0.3× 31 1.6× 26 177
Maria Elisabeth Reicher Austria 5 51 0.3× 43 0.5× 33 0.7× 16 0.8× 17 0.9× 16 105
Stuart Brock New Zealand 8 114 0.8× 116 1.2× 61 1.4× 13 0.7× 32 1.7× 13 190
Michael Kober Germany 5 98 0.7× 63 0.7× 17 0.4× 22 1.1× 10 0.5× 9 125

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Proops

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Proops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Proops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Proops more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Proops

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Proops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Proops. The network helps show where Ian Proops may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Proops

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Proops. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Proops based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Proops. Ian Proops is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Proops, Ian & Roy Sorensen. (2023). Destigmatizing the Exegetical Attribution of Lies: The Case of Kant. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 104(4). 746–768. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sorensen, Roy & Ian Proops. (2023). Kant and the king: Lying promises, conventional implicature, and hypocrisy. Ratio. 37(1). 51–63.
3.
Proops, Ian. (2021). The Fiery Test of Critique. 8 indexed citations
6.
Proops, Ian. (2017). Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein's “Tractatus.”. The Philosophical Review. 126(4). 532–535.
7.
Proops, Ian. (2014). Kant on the cosmological argument. Philosopher's Imprint. 14(12). 1–21. 15 indexed citations
8.
Proops, Ian. (2013). Kant on the Ontological Argument. Noûs. 49(1). 1–27. 19 indexed citations
9.
Proops, Ian. (2011). Russell on Substitutivity and the Abandonment of Propositions. The Philosophical Review. 120(2). 151–205. 7 indexed citations
10.
Proops, Ian. (2010). Kant's First Paralogism. The Philosophical Review. 119(4). 449–495. 17 indexed citations
11.
Proops, Ian. (2007). Russell and the Universalist Conception of Logic. Noûs. 41(1). 1–32. 4 indexed citations
12.
Proops, Ian. (2006). Russell's Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the history of philosophy. 44(2). 267–292. 5 indexed citations
13.
Proops, Ian. (2006). Soames on the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Moore and Russell. Philosophical Studies. 129(3). 627–635. 4 indexed citations
14.
Proops, Ian. (2005). Kant's Conception of Analytic Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 70(3). 588–612. 17 indexed citations
15.
Proops, Ian. (2004). Wittgenstein on the Substance of the World. European Journal of Philosophy. 12(1). 106–126. 8 indexed citations
16.
Proops, Ian. (2003). Kantis Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction. Journal of the history of philosophy. 41(2). 209–229. 22 indexed citations
17.
Kremer, Michael & Ian Proops. (2002). Logic and Language in Wittgenstein's "Tractatus". The Philosophical Review. 111(2). 327–327. 3 indexed citations
18.
Proops, Ian. (2001). Logical syntax in the tractatus. 173–191. 1 indexed citations
19.
Proops, Ian. (2001). The New Wittgenstein: A Critique. European Journal of Philosophy. 9(3). 375–404. 26 indexed citations
20.
Proops, Ian. (1997). The Early Wittgenstein on Logical Assertion. Philosophical Topics. 25(2). 121–144. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026