Clive A. Smith

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Clive A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Virology 69
  • Pharmaceutical Science 55
  • Biomedical Engineering 386
  • Epidemiology 284
  • Molecular Biology 464
Replace Dennis R. Alford with:
Dennis R. Alford United States
Sang‐Jun Park United States
Henryk Mach United States
Ryszard W. Adamiak Poland
Noriaki Minakawa Japan
Leonid Beigelman United States
Vladimir I. Razinkov United States
Jaehoon Yu South Korea
Åsa Frostell‐Karlsson Sweden
Dan Simpson United States
Clive A. Smith relative to Dennis R. Alford United States Dennis R. Alford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Dennis R. Alford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clive A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive A. Smith. The network helps show where Clive A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clive A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Clive A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013182
2 1993172
3 1986106
4 201687
5 201868
6 198858
7 202053
8 200753
9 199350
10
Nitrosamine-induced cancer: selective repair and conformational differences between O6-methylguanine residues in different positions in and around codon 12 of rat H-ras.
199143
11 201541
12 200432
13 201630
14 201728
15 200924
16 198721
17 200521
18 199019
19 200418
20 200416

About Clive A. Smith

Clive A. Smith is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (8 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (5 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (4 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (69 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (55 citations), Biomedical Engineering (386 citations), Epidemiology (284 citations) and Molecular Biology (464 citations). Clive A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Neal A. DeLuca, M. J. Phillips, Christopher Miller, Priscilla A. Schaffer, Chris Abell, Perdita E. Barran, Rohan T. Ranasinghe, Shehu Ibrahim, David Klenerman and Wilhelm T. S. Huck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Virology, Chemical Communications, Carcinogenesis, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact