Clément Dombry
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling 19
- Stochastic processes and financial applications 11
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Statistical Methods and Inference 10
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics 16
- Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals 6
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Hydrology and Drought Analysis 6
-
- Probability and Risk Models 4
-
- Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models 5
Clément Dombry
41 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Finance 191
- Statistics and Probability 99
- Mathematical Physics 72
- Global and Planetary Change 122
- Management Science and Operations Research 56
Countries citing papers authored by Clément Dombry
This map shows the geographic impact of Clément Dombry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clément Dombry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clément Dombry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clément Dombry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clément Dombry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clément Dombry. The network helps show where Clément Dombry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Clément Dombry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 0 |
About Clément Dombry
Clément Dombry is a scholar working on Finance, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research and Applied Mathematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (19 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (16 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (11 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (5 papers) and Probability and Risk Models (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (191 citations), Statistics and Probability (99 citations), Mathematical Physics (72 citations), Global and Planetary Change (122 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (56 citations). Clément Dombry has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Mathieu Ribatet, Sebastian Engelke, Marco Oesting, Juan‐Juan Cai, Zakhar Kabluchko, Le Yang, Nadine Guillotin‐Plantard, Robert L. Strawderman, Marc Arnaudon and Enkelejd Hashorva. Their work appears in journals such as Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Extremes, Bernoulli, Advances in Applied Probability and The Annals of Applied Probability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.