Stéphane Chrétien

47 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Stéphane Chrétien
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Computational Mathematics 9
  • Statistics and Probability 55
  • Artificial Intelligence 150
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 78
  • Signal Processing 36
Replace Haipeng Shen with:
Haipeng Shen United States
Michiel Debruyne Belgium
Takashi Takenouchi Japan
N. Benjamin Erichson United States
Mudassir Uddin United Kingdom
Johannes Schmidt-Hieber Netherlands
Lorenzo Finesso Italy
Mahsa Mirzargar United States
Pascal Bondon France
Stéphane Chrétien relative to Haipeng Shen United States Haipeng Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Haipeng Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Chrétien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Chrétien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Chrétien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Chrétien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Chrétien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Chrétien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Chrétien. The network helps show where Stéphane Chrétien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Chrétien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Chrétien Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Chrétien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200188
2 201636
3 200334
4 200031
5 200921
6 201417
7 200816
8 201913
9 201211
10 201511
11 201710
12 20219
13 19969
14 20189
15 20238
16 20158
17 20098
18 20137
19 20167
20 20156

About Stéphane Chrétien

Stéphane Chrétien is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 53 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (19 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (5 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (4 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (4 papers) and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (9 citations), Statistics and Probability (55 citations), Artificial Intelligence (150 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (78 citations) and Signal Processing (36 citations). Stéphane Chrétien has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alfred O. Hero, Gilles Celeux, Florence Forbes, Christophe Biernacki, Christophe Guyeux, Juan‐Pablo Ortega, Manuchehr Soleimani, Wenjuan Sun, Pascal Bondon and Christophe Varnier. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Linear Algebra and its Applications and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact