Clay Mash

820 citations
32 papers · 529 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Clay Mash

31 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

Clay Mash
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 259
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 192
  • Pharmacy 43
  • Social Psychology 146
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
Replace Michael Kavšek with:
Michael Kavšek Germany
Klaus Libertus United States
Olga Kochukhova Sweden
Iain Jackson United Kingdom
Valerie Corkum Canada
Simón B. Miranda United States
Shannon Ross‐Sheehy United States
Evelin Bertin United States
Eve E. Perris United States
Barbara D’Entremont Canada
Clay Mash relative to Michael Kavšek Germany Michael Kavšek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Michael Kavšek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clay Mash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clay Mash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clay Mash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clay Mash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clay Mash. The network helps show where Clay Mash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clay Mash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clay Mash Line = papers co-authored together Clay Mash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201044
2 199841
3 201332
4 201031
5 200330
6 200629
7 200629
8 199928
9 199525
10
Interobserver reliability of the Teller Acuity Card procedure in pediatric patients.
199625
11 200722
12 199920
13 201418
14 200218
15 200418
16 201116
17 199815
18 200712
19 201111
20 200910

About Clay Mash

Clay Mash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers) and Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (259 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (192 citations), Pharmacy (43 citations), Social Psychology (146 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations). Clay Mash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Marc H. Bornstein, Martha E. Arterberry, Velma Dobson, Bradford H. Pillow, Neil E. Berthier, Rachel Keen, Nanmathi Manian, Paul C. Quinn, Nancy Carpenter and Elizabeth Novak. Their work appears in journals such as Infancy, Infant Behavior and Development, Developmental Psychology, American Journal of Epidemiology and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact