Clay Mash

820 total citations
32 papers, 529 citations indexed

About

Clay Mash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Clay Mash has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 529 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Clay Mash's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers). Clay Mash is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers). Clay Mash collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Cameroon. Clay Mash's co-authors include Marc H. Bornstein, Martha E. Arterberry, Velma Dobson, Bradford H. Pillow, Rachel Keen, Neil E. Berthier, Nanmathi Manian, Paul C. Quinn, Nancy Carpenter and Elizabeth Novak and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Child Development and American Journal of Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Clay Mash

31 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Clay Mash United States 16 259 192 146 82 81 32 529
Ichiro Uchiyama Japan 11 139 0.5× 191 1.0× 95 0.7× 148 1.8× 34 0.4× 32 542
Michael Kavšek Germany 12 136 0.5× 192 1.0× 81 0.6× 56 0.7× 78 1.0× 33 458
Simón B. Miranda United States 11 126 0.5× 238 1.2× 56 0.4× 36 0.4× 82 1.0× 13 488
Klaus Libertus United States 16 584 2.3× 454 2.4× 123 0.8× 163 2.0× 91 1.1× 25 971
Olga Kochukhova Sweden 7 334 1.3× 219 1.1× 213 1.5× 18 0.2× 46 0.6× 22 446
Bat‐Sheva Hadad Israel 13 152 0.6× 562 2.9× 81 0.6× 60 0.7× 104 1.3× 42 649
Sergio Morra Italy 16 321 1.2× 244 1.3× 44 0.3× 40 0.5× 201 2.5× 48 670
Evelin Bertin United States 10 168 0.6× 267 1.4× 86 0.6× 29 0.4× 124 1.5× 12 376
Beatrice Dalla Barba Italy 14 127 0.5× 343 1.8× 68 0.5× 22 0.3× 159 2.0× 20 618
Valerie Corkum Canada 8 746 2.9× 473 2.5× 340 2.3× 84 1.0× 94 1.2× 8 972

Countries citing papers authored by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clay Mash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clay Mash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clay Mash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clay Mash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clay Mash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clay Mash. The network helps show where Clay Mash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clay Mash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clay Mash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clay Mash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clay Mash. Clay Mash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mash, Clay, Kimberly A. McAllister, Ashley J. Vargas, et al.. (2024). Principles and practices of returning individual research results to participants in large studies of pregnancy and childhood. American Journal of Epidemiology. 194(3). 830–836.
2.
Bornstein, Marc H., Clay Mash, Martha E. Arterberry, et al.. (2024). Visual stimulus structure, visual system neural activity, and visual behavior in young human infants. PLoS ONE. 19(6). e0302852–e0302852. 2 indexed citations
3.
Park, Christina H., Carol J. Blaisdell, S. Sonia Arteaga, et al.. (2024). How the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) cohort can spur discoveries in environmental epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology. 193(9). 1219–1223. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bornstein, Marc H., Clay Mash, Martha E. Arterberry, & Gianluca Esposito. (2023). Vertical Symmetry Is Special to Infants; Vertical Symmetry in Upright Human Faces More So. Symmetry. 15(9). 1767–1767. 3 indexed citations
5.
Esposito, Gianluca, et al.. (2014). Immediate and selective maternal brain responses to own infant faces. Behavioural Brain Research. 278. 40–43. 18 indexed citations
6.
7.
Mash, Clay, Marc H. Bornstein, & Martha E. Arterberry. (2013). Brain dynamics in young infants’ recognition of faces. Neuroreport. 24(7). 359–363. 9 indexed citations
8.
Bornstein, Marc H., Clay Mash, & Martha E. Arterberry. (2011). Perception of object–context relations: Eye-movement analyses in infants and adults.. Developmental Psychology. 47(2). 364–375. 16 indexed citations
9.
Mash, Clay & Marc H. Bornstein. (2011). 5‐Month‐Olds’ Categorization of Novel Objects: Task and Measure Dependence. Infancy. 17(2). 179–197. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bornstein, Marc H., Clay Mash, & Martha E. Arterberry. (2011). Young infants’ eye movements over “natural” scenes and “experimental” scenes. Infant Behavior and Development. 34(1). 206–210. 11 indexed citations
11.
Bornstein, Marc H., Martha E. Arterberry, Clay Mash, & Nanmathi Manian. (2010). Discrimination of facial expression by 5-month-old infants of nondepressed and clinically depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development. 34(1). 100–106. 44 indexed citations
12.
Bornstein, Marc H. & Clay Mash. (2010). Experience-Based and On-Line Categorization of Objects in Early Infancy. Child Development. 81(3). 884–897. 31 indexed citations
13.
Bornstein, Marc H., Martha E. Arterberry, & Clay Mash. (2009). Infant object categorization transcends diverse object–context relations. Infant Behavior and Development. 33(1). 7–15. 10 indexed citations
14.
Mash, Clay, Martha E. Arterberry, & Marc H. Bornstein. (2007). Mechanisms of Visual Object Recognition in Infancy: Five‐Month‐Olds Generalize Beyond the Interpolation of Familiar Views. Infancy. 12(1). 31–43. 22 indexed citations
15.
Mash, Clay. (2006). Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 95(2). 128–152. 29 indexed citations
16.
Mash, Clay & Velma Dobson. (2005). Intraobserver Reliability of the Teller Acuity Card Procedure in Infants With Perinatal Complications. Optometry and Vision Science. 82(9). 817–822. 10 indexed citations
17.
Pillow, Bradford H., et al.. (2002). Facilitating Children's Understanding of Misinterpretation: Explanatory Efforts and Improvements in Perspective Taking. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 163(2). 133–148. 18 indexed citations
18.
Mash, Clay & Bradford H. Pillow. (1998). Children's Understanding of Misinterpretation: Source Identification and Perspective-Taking.. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 44(2). 7 indexed citations
19.
Mash, Clay & Velma Dobson. (1998). Long-term reliability and predictive validity of the teller acuity card procedure. Vision Research. 38(4). 619–626. 41 indexed citations
20.
Mash, Clay, Velma Dobson, & Nancy Carpenter. (1995). Interobserver agreement for measurement of grating acuity and interocular acuity differences with the Teller acuity card procedure. Vision Research. 35(2). 303–312. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026