Cláudio J. Maia
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Surgery
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cecília R.A. SantosSílvia SocorroInês M. GomesA.C. MamedeMaria Filomena BotelhoAna Margarida AbrantesMafalda LaranjoMaria João Carvalho
- Topics
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (16 papers)Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers)Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnalytical BiochemistryChemosphere
- Partner nations
- PortugalSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cláudio J. Maia
68 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Molecular Biology 634
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 292
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 278
- Surgery 257
- Cancer Research 238
Countries citing papers authored by Cláudio J. Maia
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudio J. Maia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudio J. Maia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudio J. Maia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudio J. Maia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudio J. Maia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudio J. Maia. The network helps show where Cláudio J. Maia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudio J. Maia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudio J. Maia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudio J. Maia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudio J. Maia. Cláudio J. Maia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 306 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Cláudio J. Maia
Cláudio J. Maia is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Cancer Research and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (16 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (238 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (278 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (72 citations). Cláudio J. Maia has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cecília R.A. Santos, Sílvia Socorro, Inês M. Gomes, A.C. Mamede, Maria Filomena Botelho, Ana Margarida Abrantes, Mafalda Laranjo, Maria João Carvalho, Cátia V. Vaz and Ricardo Marques. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Analytical Biochemistry and Chemosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.