Claudia Pöhlmann

423 citations
19 papers · 287 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Claudia Pöhlmann

16 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Claudia Pöhlmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Social Psychology 175
  • Communication 30
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 138
Replace Lydia Eckstein Jackson with:
Lydia Eckstein Jackson United States
Erica R. Bailey United States
Bojana Bodroža Serbia
Lillemor Adrianson Sweden
Myungsuh Lim South Korea
Ya Hui Michelle See Singapore
Patricia J. Fairey Canada
Kristin Maurer United States
Hila Riemer Israel
Geoff Trickey United Kingdom
Claudia Pöhlmann relative to Lydia Eckstein Jackson United States Lydia Eckstein Jackson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Lydia Eckstein Jackson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Pöhlmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Pöhlmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Pöhlmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Pöhlmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Pöhlmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Pöhlmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Pöhlmann. The network helps show where Claudia Pöhlmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Claudia Pöhlmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Claudia Pöhlmann Line = papers co-authored together Claudia Pöhlmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200648
2 201442
3 200136
4 200735
5 200626
6 200821
7 200518
8 200818
9 200210
10 20149
11 20159
12 20044
13 20054
14 20134
15 20061
16 20061
17 20181
18 20250
19
Ethikunterricht und moralische Kompetenz jenseits von Werte- und Tugenderziehung
20100

About Claudia Pöhlmann

Claudia Pöhlmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (5 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (2 papers) and Education and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (44 citations), Social Psychology (175 citations), Communication (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (138 citations). Claudia Pöhlmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bettina Hannover, Norbert Birkner, Ulrich Kühnen, Sheena S. Iyengar, Erica Carranza, Hans Anand Pant, Olaf Köller, Anne Springer, Karoline Koeppen and Femke van Horen. Their work appears in journals such as Social Cognition, Large-scale Assessments in Education, Social Psychology, European Journal of Personality and European Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact