Cláudia Melo
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- María Cristina CanavarroTeresa Almeida‐SantosMarco PereiraSofia GameiroMariana Moura‐RamosAna MacedoAna FonsecaHelena Moreira
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Cláudia Melo
16 papers receiving 120 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Reproductive Medicine 49
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 48
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 33
- Clinical Psychology 22
- General Health Professions 20
Countries citing papers authored by Cláudia Melo
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudia Melo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudia Melo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudia Melo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudia Melo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudia Melo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudia Melo. The network helps show where Cláudia Melo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudia Melo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudia Melo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudia Melo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudia Melo. Cláudia Melo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | User engagement in an open collaboration community after the insertion of a game design element: An online field experiment | 2 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | A Method for Evaluating End-User Development Technologies. | 4 |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | Recomendações para a preservação do potencial reprodutivo no doente oncológico. | 6 |
| 17 | 40 |
About Cláudia Melo
Cláudia Melo is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Software, having authored 17 papers that have together received 121 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (49 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (33 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (48 citations). Cláudia Melo has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include María Cristina Canavarro, Teresa Almeida‐Santos, Marco Pereira, Sofia Gameiro, Mariana Moura‐Ramos, Ana Macedo, Ana Fonseca, Helena Moreira, Carlos Carona and Marcelo Gitirana Gomes Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Health Communication and Midwifery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.