Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment and Entrepreneurship
2010472 citationsSimeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Ramalho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Ramalho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Ramalho more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Ramalho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Ramalho. The network helps show where Rita Ramalho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita Ramalho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita Ramalho.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita Ramalho based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rita Ramalho. Rita Ramalho is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Djankov, Simeon, et al.. (2019). Business Regulations and Poverty. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Meunier, Frédéric, et al.. (2017). Women's Entrepreneurship: How to Measure the Gap between New Female and Male Entrepreneurs?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Islam, Asif, et al.. (2016). Unequal Before the Law: Measuring Legal Gender Disparities Across the World. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
10.
Almeida‐Santos, Teresa, et al.. (2016). Recomendações para a preservação do potencial reprodutivo no doente oncológico.. Estudo Geral (Universidade de Coimbra). 2(1). 5–24.6 indexed citations
11.
Ramalho, Rita, et al.. (2015). Governing growth: how business regulations can foster productivity. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Ramalho, Rita. (2014). Doing business 2014 Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises.86 indexed citations
14.
Ramalho, Rita, et al.. (2013). Mapping the legal gender gap in getting the job. 1–9.1 indexed citations
15.
Ramalho, Rita, Jorge Rodríguez‐Meza, & Judy Yang. (2010). How are firms in Eastern and Central Europe reacting to the financial crisis. 1–8.8 indexed citations
16.
Yang, Judy, et al.. (2010). How firms in eastern and central Europe are performing in the post-financial crisis world. 1–5.2 indexed citations
17.
Djankov, Simeon & Rita Ramalho. (2008). The Regulation of Labor in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.