Claude M. Schofield
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Neil L. HarrisonJohn R. HuguenardFan JiaLeonardo PignataroMinerva YuePeter A. GoldsteinNicholas D. SocciYechiel Elkabetz
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers)Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Claude M. Schofield
12 papers receiving 894 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 575
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 471
- Cognitive Neuroscience 195
- Developmental Neuroscience 141
- Genetics 79
Countries citing papers authored by Claude M. Schofield
This map shows the geographic impact of Claude M. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claude M. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claude M. Schofield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claude M. Schofield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claude M. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claude M. Schofield. The network helps show where Claude M. Schofield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claude M. Schofield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claude M. Schofield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claude M. Schofield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claude M. Schofield. Claude M. Schofield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 59 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 270 | |
| 9 | 210 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 45 |
About Claude M. Schofield
Claude M. Schofield is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (141 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (471 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations). Claude M. Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Neil L. Harrison, John R. Huguenard, Fan Jia, Leonardo Pignataro, Minerva Yue, Peter A. Goldstein, Nicholas D. Socci, Yechiel Elkabetz, Lorenz Studer and Erik M. Ullian. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.