Clare Pollock

62 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Clare Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 140
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 145
  • Social Psychology 602
  • Occupational Therapy 111
  • Pharmacology 269
Replace Naomi G. Swanson with:
Naomi G. Swanson United States
Clas‐Håkan Nygård Finland
Steven L. Sauter United States
David M. Andrews Canada
Robert A. Henning United States
Sharon Parry Australia
Jörgen Eklund Sweden
Shawn C. Roll United States
Carole James Australia
Chris Jensen Norway
Clare Pollock relative to Naomi G. Swanson United States Naomi G. Swanson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Naomi G. Swanson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Pollock. The network helps show where Clare Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clare Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clare Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Clare Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997130
2 2008127
3 201790
4 201470
5 200765
6 200965
7 200761
8 201154
9 200450
10 200644
11 200542
12 201440
13 200640
14 200839
15 199739
16
'U r a lot bolder on the net': Shyness and Internet use.
200035
17 201331
18 200031
19 200830
20 200825

About Clare Pollock

Clare Pollock is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Pharmacology, Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (26 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (15 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (8 papers), Occupational health in dentistry (7 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (7 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (5 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (140 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (145 citations), Social Psychology (602 citations), Occupational Therapy (111 citations) and Pharmacology (269 citations). Clare Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Leon Straker, Robin Burgess‐Limerick, Barbara A. Maslen, Rachel Skoss, Jemma Coleman, Lynne D. Roberts, Courtenay Harris, Brody Heritage, Svend Erik Mathiassen and Marina Ciccarelli. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Ergonomics, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact