Cindi L. Schwartz
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Structural Biology top 0.2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. Richard McIntoshDaniela NicastroJason PiersonMary E. PorterDavid N. MastronardeAndreas HoengerMary MorphewFazoil I. Ataullakhanov
- Topics
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (10 papers)Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers)Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySingapore
In The Last Decade
Cindi L. Schwartz
44 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Cell Biology 762
- Structural Biology 524
- Genetics 349
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 187
Countries citing papers authored by Cindi L. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Cindi L. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindi L. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindi L. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cindi L. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindi L. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindi L. Schwartz. The network helps show where Cindi L. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindi L. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindi L. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindi L. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindi L. Schwartz. Cindi L. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 61 | |
| 14 | 165 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 138 | |
| 18 | The Molecular Architecture of Axonemes Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomographybreakdown → | 667 |
| 19 | 91 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Cindi L. Schwartz
Cindi L. Schwartz is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Parasitology and Virology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (10 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (524 citations), Cell Biology (762 citations) and Biophysics (183 citations). Cindi L. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include J. Richard McIntosh, Daniela Nicastro, Jason Pierson, Mary E. Porter, David N. Mastronarde, Andreas Hoenger, Mary Morphew, Fazoil I. Ataullakhanov, Aaron M. Neiman and Eileen O’Toole. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.