Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?
2011280 citationsChristopher R. Berry et al.American Journal of Political Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher R. Berry
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher R. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher R. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher R. Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher R. Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher R. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher R. Berry. The network helps show where Christopher R. Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher R. Berry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher R. Berry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher R. Berry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher R. Berry. Christopher R. Berry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ashworth, Scott, Christopher R. Berry, & Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. (2021). Theory and Credibility. Princeton University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
3.
Ashworth, Scott, Christopher R. Berry, & Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. (2021). Theory and Credibility. Princeton University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
4.
Berry, Christopher R., et al.. (2019). Taxed Out: Illegal Property Tax Assessments and the Epidemic of Tax Foreclosures in Detroit. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9(4). 847.5 indexed citations
5.
Berry, Christopher R., et al.. (2019). Taxed Out: Illegal property tax assessments and the epidemic of tax foreclosures in Detroit (forthcoming 2019). UC Irvine law review.1 indexed citations
6.
Berry, Christopher R. & Jacob E. Gersen. (2017). Agency Design and Political Control. The Yale Law Journal. 126(4). 2.12 indexed citations
7.
Berry, Christopher R., et al.. (2012). Making Courts Matter: Politics and the Implementation of State Supreme Court Decisions. The University of Chicago Law Review. 79(1). 1.
8.
Berry, Christopher R., et al.. (2011). Election Timing and Public Policy. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 6(2). 103–135.42 indexed citations
9.
Berry, Christopher R., et al.. (2010). School-Finance Reform in Red and Blue. Education next. 10(3). 62–68.2 indexed citations
Berry, Christopher R.. (2004). School Inflation: The Dramatic Growth in School Size during the 20th Century Yields Evidence That Bigger Is Not Necessarily Better. Education next. 4(4). 56.
Berry, Christopher R.. (1984). Local government electoral turnout for Metropolitan Perth. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.