Christopher L. Blume

525 total citations
7 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Christopher L. Blume is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher L. Blume has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Christopher L. Blume's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). Christopher L. Blume is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). Christopher L. Blume collaborates with scholars based in United States. Christopher L. Blume's co-authors include Nelson Cowan, J. Scott Saults, Jeffrey N. Rouder, Alicia Forsberg, Amanda L. Gilchrist, Alexander P. Boone, Kyle O. Hardman, Angela M. AuBuchon, Timothy J. Ricker and Evie Vergauwe and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Christopher L. Blume

7 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Christopher L. Blume United States	7	280	126	82	42	24	7	345
Herbert Hagendorf Germany	12	292 1.0×	85 0.7×	41 0.5×	42 1.0×	19 0.8×	26	353
Tamra J. Bireta United States	10	301 1.1×	125 1.0×	180 2.2×	28 0.7×	57 2.4×	22	362
Christie Chung United States	6	264 0.9×	71 0.6×	100 1.2×	67 1.6×	28 1.2×	10	323
Max Siegel United States	6	229 0.8×	146 1.2×	63 0.8×	31 0.7×	34 1.4×	15	351
Jifan Zhou China	10	220 0.8×	80 0.6×	38 0.5×	72 1.7×	10 0.4×	47	309
Annie Jalbert Canada	9	282 1.0×	129 1.0×	113 1.4×	33 0.8×	38 1.6×	11	327
Rebecca A. Gilbert United Kingdom	8	145 0.5×	72 0.6×	65 0.8×	22 0.5×	48 2.0×	16	233
Jorge Morales United States	9	281 1.0×	75 0.6×	35 0.4×	31 0.7×	15 0.6×	21	352
Heike Elchlepp United Kingdom	11	277 1.0×	55 0.4×	78 1.0×	21 0.5×	11 0.5×	18	310
Karen A. Daniels United States	7	318 1.1×	86 0.7×	93 1.1×	67 1.6×	59 2.5×	9	359

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher L. Blume

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher L. Blume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher L. Blume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher L. Blume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher L. Blume

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher L. Blume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher L. Blume. The network helps show where Christopher L. Blume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher L. Blume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher L. Blume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher L. Blume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher L. Blume. Christopher L. Blume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Forsberg, Alicia, Christopher L. Blume, & Nelson Cowan. (2021). The development of metacognitive accuracy in working memory across childhood.. Developmental Psychology. 57(8). 1297–1317. 27 indexed citations

2.

Cowan, Nelson, Angela M. AuBuchon, Amanda L. Gilchrist, et al.. (2020). Developmental change in the nature of attention allocation in a dual task.. Developmental Psychology. 57(1). 33–46. 11 indexed citations

3.

Cowan, Nelson, et al.. (2015). Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(2). 169–185. 11 indexed citations

4.

Cowan, Nelson, J. Scott Saults, & Christopher L. Blume. (2014). Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 143(5). 1806–1836. 103 indexed citations

5.

Ricker, Timothy J., et al.. (2014). No recovery of memory when cognitive load is decreased.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(3). 872–880. 6 indexed citations

6.

Cowan, Nelson, Jeffrey N. Rouder, Christopher L. Blume, & J. Scott Saults. (2012). Models of verbal working memory capacity: What does it take to make them work?. Psychological Review. 119(3). 480–499. 96 indexed citations

7.

Cowan, Nelson, Christopher L. Blume, & J. Scott Saults. (2012). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(3). 731–747. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact