Michael J. Pro

589 total citations
39 papers, 341 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Pro is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Pro has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 341 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Ophthalmology, 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Pro's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (33 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (19 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers). Michael J. Pro is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (33 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (19 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers). Michael J. Pro collaborates with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Canada. Michael J. Pro's co-authors include Marlene R. Moster, L. Jay Katz, Jonathan S. Myers, Reza Razeghinejad, Daniel R. Lefton, Mauricio E Pons, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Mark J. Kupersmith and George L. Spaeth and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Pro

36 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Pro United States 11 300 133 73 42 36 39 341
Alex P. Lange Canada 12 191 0.6× 153 1.2× 107 1.5× 57 1.4× 43 1.2× 17 316
Azusa Fujikawa Japan 11 268 0.9× 157 1.2× 53 0.7× 17 0.4× 76 2.1× 19 358
Matthew S. Pihlblad United States 10 105 0.3× 73 0.5× 96 1.3× 45 1.1× 44 1.2× 25 227
Dewang Angmo India 14 511 1.7× 355 2.7× 78 1.1× 78 1.9× 32 0.9× 65 587
Mengwei Li China 8 235 0.8× 194 1.5× 34 0.5× 41 1.0× 12 0.3× 21 291
Kundandeep S. Nagi United States 9 181 0.6× 111 0.8× 33 0.5× 34 0.8× 16 0.4× 14 237
Roberto Carassa Italy 11 394 1.3× 239 1.8× 89 1.2× 57 1.4× 23 0.6× 21 422
Xiran Zhuang China 8 344 1.1× 252 1.9× 28 0.4× 27 0.6× 49 1.4× 10 414
Kevin Kaplowitz United States 14 565 1.9× 385 2.9× 130 1.8× 72 1.7× 24 0.7× 34 644
Jörg Stürmer Switzerland 6 464 1.5× 348 2.6× 59 0.8× 29 0.7× 16 0.4× 13 472

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Pro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Pro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Pro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Pro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Pro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Pro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Pro. The network helps show where Michael J. Pro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Pro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Pro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Pro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Pro. Michael J. Pro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hallaj, Shahin, Aakriti Garg Shukla, Michael J. Pro, et al.. (2024). Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Implants in Eyes with Preoperative Intraocular Pressure Less than 19 mmHg. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2024. 1–7.
2.
Shalaby, Wesam Shamseldin, et al.. (2023). Ahmed ClearPath vs. Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 7(3). 251–259. 3 indexed citations
3.
Lin, Michael M., et al.. (2023). Outcomes of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty After Prior Incisional Surgery for Open Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma. 32(6). 474–479. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bowers, Mallory E., Michael K. Wong, Marlene R. Moster, et al.. (2023). Effect of bimatoprost sustained-release intracameral implant on intraocular pressure and medication burden in patients with prior glaucoma surgery. Journal Français d Ophtalmologie. 47(2). 103996–103996. 2 indexed citations
5.
Mahmoudzadeh, Raziyeh, Mirataollah Salabati, Reza Razeghinejad, et al.. (2023). Glaucoma Surgical Outcomes in Patients with a History of Scleritis. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 32(6). 987–993. 1 indexed citations
6.
Starr, Matthew R., Michael J. Ammar, Luv Patel, et al.. (2021). Endophthalmitis after Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery. Ophthalmology. 128(12). 1777–1779. 8 indexed citations
7.
Shalaby, Wesam Shamseldin, Jonathan S. Myers, Reza Razeghinejad, et al.. (2020). Outcomes of Valved and Nonvalved Tube Shunts in Neovascular Glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 4(2). 182–192. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lin, Michael M., L. Jay Katz, Michael J. Pro, et al.. (2020). Netarsudil’s Effect in Eyes with a History of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 3(4). 306–308. 7 indexed citations
9.
Lin, Michael M., et al.. (2019). Outcomes of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 689–689. 1 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Qiang, et al.. (2019). Fornix-Based Trabeculectomy Conjunctival Closure. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2(4). 251–257. 1 indexed citations
11.
Resende, Arthur, et al.. (2016). Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implantation in Patients With Markedly Elevated Intraocular Pressure (≥30 mm Hg). Journal of Glaucoma. 25(9). 738–743. 5 indexed citations
12.
Katz, L. Jay, Jonathan S. Myers, Marlene R. Moster, et al.. (2014). A comparison of methods used to evaluate mobility performance in the visually impaired. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 99(1). 113–118. 10 indexed citations
13.
Pro, Michael J., et al.. (2014). Explantation of the Novel Ahmed Glaucoma Valve M4 Implant. Journal of Glaucoma. 24(2). e1–e4. 5 indexed citations
14.
Moster, Marlene R., et al.. (2014). Intracameral Triamcinolone Acetonide in Glaucoma Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 158(2). 395–401.e2. 8 indexed citations
15.
Moster, Marlene R., et al.. (2013). Needle Bleb Revision With Bevacizumab and Mitomycin C Compared With Mitomycin C Alone for Failing Filtration Blebs. Journal of Glaucoma. 24(4). 311–315. 10 indexed citations
16.
Fudemberg, S., L. Jay Katz, Marlene R. Moster, et al.. (2011). The Effects of Mozart's Music on the Performance of Glaucoma Patients on Automated Perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(10). 7347–7347. 7 indexed citations
17.
Myers, Jonathan S., Sheryl S. Wizov, Marlene R. Moster, et al.. (2011). Effects Of Latanoprost Versus Travoprost With Sofzia On The Ocular Surface Of Patients. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 229–229. 1 indexed citations
18.
Razeghinejad, Reza, Michael J. Pro, & L. Jay Katz. (2011). Non-steroidal drug-induced glaucoma. Eye. 25(8). 971–980. 30 indexed citations
19.
Myers, Jonathan S., Joanne Katz, Sheryl S. Wizov, et al.. (2010). Ocular Surface Changes in Patients Using Latanoprost and Travoprost With Sofzia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 168–168. 1 indexed citations
20.
Molineaux, Jeanne, Michael J. Pro, Marlene R. Moster, et al.. (2009). Performance of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, OCT III, and HRT III in the Diagnosis of Open Angle Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5816–5816.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026