Christine King
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cath Rogers‐ClarkHelen RossElizabeth BuikstraDesley HegneyD. M. FreebairnPeter G. BakerKathryn McLachlanJosephine Ryan
- Topics
- Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers)Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers)Community Health and Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Christine King
34 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Sociology and Political Science 345
- General Health Professions 242
- Clinical Psychology 214
- Health 197
- Global and Planetary Change 130
Countries citing papers authored by Christine King
This map shows the geographic impact of Christine King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christine King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine King. The network helps show where Christine King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine King. Christine King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 229 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 119 | |
| 12 | The Role of Intent in Ethical Decision Making: The Ethical Choice Model | 1 |
| 13 | 111 | |
| 14 | Contemporary agri-ecological systems and their contribution to community resilience: reconnecting people and food, and people with people | 0 |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | Rats and rice: Belief network models of rodent control in the rice fields of Cambodia | 10 |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About Christine King
Christine King is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Family Practice and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers) and Community Health and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (197 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (91 citations) and Clinical Psychology (214 citations). Christine King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Cath Rogers‐Clark, Helen Ross, Elizabeth Buikstra, Desley Hegney, D. M. Freebairn, Peter G. Baker, Kathryn McLachlan, Josephine Ryan, Doris W. Campbell and I. W. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and Crop Protection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.