Christian Nansen
- Plant Science top 1%
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Thomas W. PhillipsWilliam G. MeikleNorman C. ElliottDavid K. WeaverXavier MartiniNiels HolstKen FlowerJustin B. Runyon
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (44 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (43 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (42 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Christian Nansen
139 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Plant Science 1.6k
- Insect Science 1.5k
- Ecology 508
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 420
- Molecular Biology 390
Countries citing papers authored by Christian Nansen
This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Nansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Nansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Nansen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Nansen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Nansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Nansen. The network helps show where Christian Nansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christian Nansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christian Nansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christian Nansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christian Nansen. Christian Nansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | DYNAMICS OF SHORT-TERM VARIATION IN POLLEN FORAGING BY HONEY BEES | 1 |
About Christian Nansen
Christian Nansen is a scholar working on Insect Science, Analytical Chemistry and Plant Science, having authored 144 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (44 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (43 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.5k citations), Plant Science (1.6k citations) and Analytical Chemistry (288 citations). Christian Nansen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas W. Phillips, William G. Meikle, Norman C. Elliott, David K. Weaver, Xavier Martini, Niels Holst, Ken Flower, Justin B. Runyon, Sam Korie and Michael V. Kolomiets. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.