Chrisje Brants
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Clinical Psychology
- Gender Studies
- Law top 10%
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers)European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (6 papers)Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Law and SocietyPolicing & Society
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Chrisje Brants
17 papers receiving 117 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 91
- Political Science and International Relations 34
- Clinical Psychology 31
- Gender Studies 23
- Law 21
Countries citing papers authored by Chrisje Brants
This map shows the geographic impact of Chrisje Brants's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chrisje Brants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chrisje Brants more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chrisje Brants
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chrisje Brants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chrisje Brants. The network helps show where Chrisje Brants may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chrisje Brants
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chrisje Brants. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chrisje Brants based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chrisje Brants. Chrisje Brants is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Culpability compared: Mental capacity, criminal offences and the role of the expert in common law and civil law jurisdictions | 1 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Transitional justice : images and memories | 5 |
| 8 | Wrongful Convictions and Inquisitorial Process: The Case of the Netherlands | 13 |
| 9 | Issues of Convergence: Inquisitorial Prosecution in England and Wales? | 3 |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | The protection of fundamental human rights in criminal process General report | 1 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Plea Bargaining in de Verenigde Staten en in Engeland en Wales | 1 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | Participation rights and proactive policing: convergence and drift in European criminal process | 4 |
| 18 | 4 |
About Chrisje Brants
Chrisje Brants is a scholar working on Law, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 18 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (6 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (23 citations), Law (21 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (91 citations). Chrisje Brants has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Dina Siegel, Susanne Karstedt, Tim Wilson, Adam Jackson, Derek Johnson and Frans Koenraadt. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Law and Society and Policing & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.