Mark Nesbitt

1.7k total citations
52 papers, 853 citations indexed

About

Mark Nesbitt is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Nesbitt has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 853 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Plant Science, 18 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 11 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Mark Nesbitt's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (7 papers). Mark Nesbitt is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (7 papers). Mark Nesbitt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Mark Nesbitt's co-authors include Howell G. M. Edwards, Luiz Fernando Cappa de Oliveira, Martin K. Jones, Delwen Samuel, Eudes S. Velozo, Mélanie Broin, Henk Beentje, J.S. Siemonsma, Rowena Gale and Jonathan M. Sykes and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Mark Nesbitt

47 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Nesbitt United Kingdom 16 234 229 216 110 107 52 853
Charlene Murphy United Kingdom 12 279 1.2× 198 0.9× 94 0.4× 51 0.5× 128 1.2× 22 640
Hongen Jiang China 23 661 2.8× 302 1.3× 152 0.7× 109 1.0× 280 2.6× 66 1.4k
Jack Rossen United States 12 371 1.6× 132 0.6× 124 0.6× 48 0.4× 252 2.4× 30 929
Sarah Ivorra France 19 176 0.8× 787 3.4× 112 0.5× 97 0.9× 128 1.2× 52 1.2k
Daniel Comeskey United Kingdom 15 387 1.7× 77 0.3× 273 1.3× 36 0.3× 377 3.5× 28 862
Sonia Zarrillo Canada 7 284 1.2× 187 0.8× 62 0.3× 45 0.4× 170 1.6× 10 744
Xiaoling Zhang China 13 74 0.3× 221 1.0× 29 0.1× 45 0.4× 74 0.7× 28 690
Donald Ugent United States 13 136 0.6× 287 1.3× 32 0.1× 46 0.4× 41 0.4× 22 577
Linda Perry United States 18 786 3.4× 423 1.8× 117 0.5× 55 0.5× 359 3.4× 22 1.5k
Soultana-Maria Valamoti Greece 24 876 3.7× 232 1.0× 530 2.5× 40 0.4× 252 2.4× 65 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nesbitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nesbitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nesbitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nesbitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nesbitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nesbitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nesbitt. The network helps show where Mark Nesbitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Nesbitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Nesbitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Nesbitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Nesbitt. Mark Nesbitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Nesbitt, Mark, et al.. (2023). 1063. Lathyrus oleraceus Lam.: Leguminosae. Curtis s Botanical Magazine. 40(2). 197–205. 2 indexed citations
3.
Scott, Andrew C., et al.. (2023). Pharmaceutical Terminology in Ancient and Medieval Time – andrachne, chrysocolla and Others. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13. 715–736. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pérez‐Escobar, Oscar A., Robyn F. Powell, Mats Töpel, et al.. (2022). A highly contiguous, scaffold-level nuclear genome assembly for the fever tree (Cinchona pubescens Vahl) as a novel resource for Rubiaceae research. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2022. 1–16. 2 indexed citations
5.
Diazgranados, Mauricio, Robert Allkinꝉ, Rodrigo Cámara‐Leret, et al.. (2020). World Checklist of Useful Plant Species. California Digital Library. 29 indexed citations
6.
Nesbitt, Mark, et al.. (2019). Assessing Extreme Seed Longevity: The Value of Historic Botanical Collections to Modern Research. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10. 1181–1181. 8 indexed citations
7.
Cornett, Claus, Kim Walker, Felix Driver, et al.. (2019). Historical chemical annotations of Cinchona bark collections are comparable to results from current day high-pressure liquid chromatography technologies. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 249. 112375–112375. 25 indexed citations
8.
Fairbairn, Andrew & Mark Nesbitt. (2019). Gordon C. Hillman 20 July 1943 to 1 July 2018. Anatolian Studies. 69. iii–iv. 1 indexed citations
9.
Nesbitt, Mark, et al.. (2017). The Archaeobotany of Aşvan Environment and Cultivation in Eastern Anatolia from the Chalcolithic to the Medieval Period. UCL Discovery (University College London). 3 indexed citations
10.
Brand, Eric, Christine Léon, Mark Nesbitt, et al.. (2017). Economic botany collections: A source of material evidence for exploring historical changes in Chinese medicinal materials. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 200. 209–227. 15 indexed citations
11.
Valk, Jan van der, Christine Léon, & Mark Nesbitt. (2017). Macroscopic authentication of Chinese materia medica (CMM): A UK market study of seeds and fruits. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 8. 40–51. 15 indexed citations
12.
Oliveira, M. Conceição, et al.. (2015). HPLC-DAD-MS analysis of colorant and resinous components of lac-dye: A comparison between Kerria and Paratachardina genera. Dyes and Pigments. 118. 129–136. 32 indexed citations
13.
Nagata, Toshiyuki, Ashley DuVal, Hans Walter Lack, et al.. (2013). An Unusual Xylotheque with Plant Illustrations from Early Meiji Japan. Economic Botany. 67(2). 87–97. 6 indexed citations
14.
Crane, Peter R., Toshiyuki Nagata, Jin Murata, et al.. (2013). 773. GINKGO BILOBA – Connections with people and art across a thousand years. Curtis s Botanical Magazine. 30(3). 239–260. 2 indexed citations
15.
Sousa, Micaela M., et al.. (2013). Identification of Dactylopius cochineal species with high-performance liquid chromatography and multivariate data analysis. The Analyst. 138(20). 6081–6081. 14 indexed citations
16.
Goyder, D. J., et al.. (2012). SIR JOSEPH HOOKER'S COLLECTIONS AT THE ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW. Curtis s Botanical Magazine. 29(1). 66–85. 3 indexed citations
17.
Edwards, Howell G. M., Luiz Fernando Cappa de Oliveira, & Mark Nesbitt. (2002). Fourier-transform Raman characterization of brazilwood trees and substitutes. The Analyst. 128(1). 82–87. 40 indexed citations
18.
Nesbitt, Mark & Delwen Samuel. (1998). Wheat Domestication: Archaeobotanical Evidence. Science. 279(5356). 1431–1431. 49 indexed citations
19.
Nesbitt, Mark. (1995). Growth factors. Nature. 375(6529). 289–289. 3 indexed citations
20.
Swift, M. J., et al.. (1976). The decomposition of branch-wood in the canopy and floor of a mixed deciduous woodland. Oecologia. 26(2). 139–149. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026