Chi-Ming Hou

512 citations
19 papers · 238 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Chi-Ming Hou

18 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers

Chi-Ming Hou
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 95
  • Cultural Studies 19
  • Political Science and International Relations 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 89
Replace Brian Van Arkadie with:
Brian Van Arkadie United States
Irving Stone United States
S. Herbert Frankel United States
D. A. Farnie United Kingdom
W. J. Macpherson United States
Mark Falcoff United States
Michael Palairet United Kingdom
Herbert Feis United States
Louis Emmerij United States
Peter Harnetty Canada
Chi-Ming Hou relative to Brian Van Arkadie United States Brian Van Arkadie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Brian Van Arkadie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Ming Hou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Ming Hou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Ming Hou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Ming Hou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Ming Hou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Ming Hou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Ming Hou. The network helps show where Chi-Ming Hou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Chi-Ming Hou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi-Ming Hou Line = papers co-authored together Chi-Ming Hou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196664
2 198141
3 196540
4 198625
5 196818
6 196611
7 19818
8 19677
9 20245
10 19614
11 19633
12 19613
13 19682
14 19632
15
The Taiwan model of agricultural assistance
19941
16 19661
17 19791
18 19831
19 19981

About Chi-Ming Hou

Chi-Ming Hou is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Pharmacology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (1 paper), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper) and Fungal Biology and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (64 citations), Economics and Econometrics (95 citations), Cultural Studies (19 citations), Political Science and International Relations (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (89 citations). Chi-Ming Hou has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Donnithorne, Kwang-Ching Liu, Parks M. Coble, Qian Wang, Xinhua Sui, Xiao‐Chen Huang, Michael R. Godley, Shan‐hui Hsu and Hongli Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Asian Studies, The Journal of Economic History, The American Historical Review, Economic Development and Cultural Change and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact