Herbert Feis

931 citations
43 papers · 288 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Herbert Feis

37 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Herbert Feis
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Development 23
  • Political Science and International Relations 127
  • Finance 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 114
  • History 24
Replace Sally Marks with:
Sally Marks United States
Carl Parrini United States
Bernadotte E. Schmitt United States
A. P. Thornton Canada
Dana G. Munro United States
Malcolm Cook United Kingdom
Olga Crisp United Kingdom
R. Barry Farrell
Arthur E. Tiedemann United States
Brownlee Sands Corrin United States
Herbert Feis relative to Sally Marks United States Sally Marks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Sally Marks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Feis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Feis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Feis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Feis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Feis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Feis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Feis. The network helps show where Herbert Feis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Herbert Feis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herbert Feis Line = papers co-authored together Herbert Feis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Europe, the world's banker, 1870-1914
196457
2 195853
3 196018
4 195517
5 196115
6 196113
7 196611
8 19669
9
1933: characters in crisis
19668
10
Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin
19577
11 19677
12 19537
13 19585
14 19515
15 19615
16 19725
17 19585
18
The diplomacy of the dollar, 1919-1932
19664
19 19674
20 19514

About Herbert Feis

Herbert Feis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (8 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (1 paper), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper) and Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (23 citations), Political Science and International Relations (127 citations), Finance (30 citations), Sociology and Political Science (114 citations) and History (24 citations). Herbert Feis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James W. Angell, Paul Kecskemeti, George F. Kennan, Samuel Flagg Bemis, H. Arthur Steiner, Diana O. Perkins, John Κ. Fairbank, Edwin O. Reischauer, Robert H. Ferrell and William L. Neumann. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Foreign Affairs, The Russian Review, Pacific Affairs and Hispanic American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact