Chih‐Cheng Chen

613 total citations
17 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Chih‐Cheng Chen is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Marketing and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Chih‐Cheng Chen has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Strategy and Management, 12 papers in Marketing and 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Chih‐Cheng Chen's work include Sustainable Supply Chain Management (12 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (9 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers). Chih‐Cheng Chen is often cited by papers focused on Sustainable Supply Chain Management (12 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (9 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers). Chih‐Cheng Chen collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. Chih‐Cheng Chen's co-authors include Ming‐Lang Tseng, Asif Khan, Athapol Ruangkanjanases, Shih‐Chih Chen, Yuan-Hsu Lin, Kuo‐Jui Wu, Hiền Minh Hà, Chun‐Wei Lin, Tat‐Dat Bui and Thi Phuong Thuy Tran and has published in prestigious journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, International Journal of Production Economics and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Chih‐Cheng Chen

17 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chih‐Cheng Chen Taiwan 11 259 189 58 55 39 17 417
Pik Yin Foo Malaysia 8 194 0.7× 122 0.6× 94 1.6× 26 0.5× 29 0.7× 12 343
Disraeli Asante‐Darko Ghana 11 284 1.1× 209 1.1× 95 1.6× 29 0.5× 45 1.2× 21 505
Breno Nunes United Kingdom 10 337 1.3× 176 0.9× 120 2.1× 50 0.9× 33 0.8× 31 492
Aysun Kahraman Türkiye 6 278 1.1× 228 1.2× 45 0.8× 28 0.5× 21 0.5× 13 452
Sushanta Tripathy India 10 240 0.9× 118 0.6× 100 1.7× 32 0.6× 39 1.0× 41 414
Joseph R. Huscroft United States 9 281 1.1× 177 0.9× 111 1.9× 24 0.4× 33 0.8× 15 470
Ghasem Rezaei Malaysia 6 168 0.6× 138 0.7× 40 0.7× 89 1.6× 29 0.7× 9 333
Yeneneh Tamirat Negash Taiwan 12 186 0.7× 104 0.6× 46 0.8× 73 1.3× 39 1.0× 33 447
Fábio Müller Guerrini Brazil 9 243 0.9× 83 0.4× 100 1.7× 49 0.9× 47 1.2× 37 414
Antony Upward Canada 5 336 1.3× 300 1.6× 25 0.4× 35 0.6× 33 0.8× 7 553

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Cheng Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Cheng Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Cheng Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Cheng Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Cheng Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Cheng Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Cheng Chen. The network helps show where Chih‐Cheng Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chih‐Cheng Chen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chih‐Cheng Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chih‐Cheng Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chih‐Cheng Chen. Chih‐Cheng Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Tsai, Feng Ming, et al.. (2024). Assessing a Hierarchical Structure for Circular Supply Chain Management Performance: Improving Firms' Eco‐Innovation and Technological Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 34(2). 2035–2064. 9 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, et al.. (2023). Importance–performance and potential gain of food delivery apps: in view of the restaurant partner perspective. British Food Journal. 126(5). 1981–2003. 8 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, et al.. (2023). Evaluating a sustainable circular economy model for the Indonesian fashion industry under uncertainties: a hybrid decision-making approach. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering. 40(3). 188–204. 10 indexed citations
4.
Tseng, Ming‐Lang, Hiền Minh Hà, Thi Phuong Thuy Tran, et al.. (2022). Building a data‐driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment. 31(5). 2082–2106. 71 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, et al.. (2022). Sustainable recyclate packaging in Indonesian food and beverage industry: a hybrid decision-making analysis in consumption stages. Quality & Quantity. 57(3). 2053–2089. 5 indexed citations
7.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, Asif Khan, Tanaporn Hongsuchon, et al.. (2021). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Image in Times of Crisis: The Mediating Role of Customer Trust. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(16). 8275–8275. 62 indexed citations
8.
Khan, Asif, et al.. (2021). Supply Chain Ambidexterity and Green SCM: Moderating Role of Network Capabilities. Sustainability. 13(11). 5974–5974. 27 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, et al.. (2021). Visualizing the hierarchical sustainable human resource management under qualitative information and complex interrelationships. Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal. 32(6). 1422–1447. 11 indexed citations
10.
Yang, Feng, et al.. (2021). Intelligent Identification Technology of Attributes of Users’ Transformers Based on Gray Correlation Analysis. Sensors and Materials. 33(4). 1219–1219. 1 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Chia‐Nan, et al.. (2021). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Fuzzy Decision Problems: A Case Study in the Frozen Shrimp Industry. Symmetry. 13(3). 370–370. 21 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Chih‐Cheng, et al.. (2021). Sustainable consumption transition model: Social concerns and waste minimization under willingness-to-pay in Indonesian food industry. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 170. 105590–105590. 24 indexed citations
13.
Tseng, Ming‐Lang, Chih‐Cheng Chen, Kuo‐Jui Wu, & Raymond R. Tan. (2020). Eco-efficient sustainable service supply chain management hierarchical model based on qualitative information and quantitative data. Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal. 31(4). 961–984. 17 indexed citations
14.
Wu, Kuo‐Jui, et al.. (2015). Exploring eco-innovation in dynamic organizational capability under incomplete information in the Taiwanese lighting industry. International Journal of Production Economics. 181. 419–440. 47 indexed citations
15.
Chen, Chih‐Jou, et al.. (2014). HOW CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION CAN DRIVE REPURCHASE INTENT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 207. 3 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Yuan Hsu, et al.. (2014). Balanced scorecard performance evaluation in a closed-loop hierarchical model under uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing. 24. 1022–1032. 21 indexed citations
17.
Lin, Yuan-Hsu, Ming‐Lang Tseng, Chih‐Cheng Chen, & Anthony S.F. Chiu. (2010). Positioning strategic competitiveness of green business innovation capabilities using hybrid method. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(3). 1839–1849. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026