Chia‐Hui Lin

1.3k citations
51 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Chia‐Hui Lin

48 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Chia‐Hui Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Condensed Matter Physics 152
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 231
  • Accounting 110
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Biochemistry 42
Replace Kei Suzuki with:
Kei Suzuki Japan
Hee Young Kwon South Korea
Gang Su China
Seiji Adachi Japan
Zijun Ouyang China
Chia‐Hsien Lin Taiwan
Ge Yang United States
Manuel Matzinger Austria
Siu‐Kai Kong Hong Kong
Chia‐Hui Lin relative to Kei Suzuki Japan Kei Suzuki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Kei Suzuki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chia‐Hui Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chia‐Hui Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chia‐Hui Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chia‐Hui Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chia‐Hui Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chia‐Hui Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chia‐Hui Lin. The network helps show where Chia‐Hui Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chia‐Hui Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chia‐Hui Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chia‐Hui Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200695
2 201292
3 200886
4 201770
5 200765
6 201259
7 201157
8 201649
9 201145
10 200440
11 201434
12 201624
13 201722
14
Ligands for programmed cell death 1 gene in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
200721
15 201321
16 201319
17 201419
18 201318
19 200918
20 201117

About Chia‐Hui Lin

Chia‐Hui Lin is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron-based superconductors research (8 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (7 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (4 papers), Blood transfusion and management (3 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (3 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (152 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (231 citations), Accounting (110 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations) and Biochemistry (42 citations). Chia‐Hui Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Wei Ku, Tom Berlijn, Jing‐Ru Weng, Ching-Shih Chen, Chih‐Hsin Shih, Yuya Sakurai, Wei‐Guo Yin, Chien‐Hsing Lu, Masahiro N. Machida and Takashi Hosokawa. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Molecules, Biomicrofluidics and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact